Re: [ANN] Turbo.lua v1.0-beta1
- From: Sébastien Volle <sebastien.volle@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: luajit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 18:26:54 +0100
Congratulations, Turbo sounds fantastic. About the benchmarks, could you
provide a little more details about the versions used? I reckon that would
be LuaJIT 2.0, PyPy 2.1 and Node 0.10.x. But the three runtimes presented
are under heavy development and their performance characteristics are
likely to evolve quite a bit in the future, so it would be nice to have a
point of reference in time.
-- seb
2013/10/29 Petite Abeille <petite.abeille@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> On Oct 29, 2013, at 2:48 PM, John Abrahamsen <jhnabrhmsn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Petite Abeille: The expiry dates are so long because the static file
> > handler is setting them to a incredible amount of time for things that
> will
> > never change (pictures etc.). The amount is the same amount that the
> > Varnish reverse proxy uses in its code.
>
> (All good and fine. But this is invalid as far as HTTP 1.1 goes. Years are
> 4 digits only in an HTTP-date such as 'Expires'. And that's that.)
>
> In any case, nicely done nonetheless :)
>
>
>
Other related posts:
