[lit-ideas] what is important is to stop dental science from being appreciated, that can lead to scientism and THAT decreses the sales revenue of the heirs of the sack of turds in lederhosen
- From: palma <palmaadriano@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: "lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 12:25:24 +0200
in any event the primary access to yourself and the world is brought about
by ruminating about the following burning issue.
did heidegger fart? when? before or after the rektorat rede? because if
before the only problem is the clumsyness of his attempt to be forgiven by
his other friend, the turdette in lederhosen from Austria.
the bets way to llok at it is via the memoirs of K Loewith. and it does not
matter, dental science must be prohibited, many dentisrts are also jewish
and two that I knew were communists
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 12:19 PM, <cblists@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 27 Mar 2014, at 10:18, palma <palmaadriano@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > crucial test: replace scientism with dentism ... namely the access to
> dental science denies the humanity of having cavities dealt with by reading
> pages of heidegger ...
>
> I appeal to other list members - do I really have to address such a
> misrepresentation of Heidegger's view of 'scientism'? Does anyone else
> regard the passages above as an adequate representation and thus 'crucial
> test' of either of the passage from Critchley on Heidegger's critique of
> scientism which I quoted earlier or anything found in Heidegger's writings?
>
> Cf. another passage from Michael Wheeler's "Martin Heidegger" in The
> Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2013 Edition), Edward N. Zalta
> (ed.):
>
> http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2013/entries/heidegger/
>
> "Heidegger was no eco-warrior and no luddite. Although he often promoted a
> romantic image of a pre-technological age ... he did not believe that it is
> possible for modern humankind to forge some pastoral Eden from which
> technology (in both the everyday and the essential sense) is entirely
> absent. So we should neither 'push on blindly with technology' nor 'curse
> it as the work of the devil' ... Indeed, both these options would at root
> be technological modes of thinking. The way forward, according to
> Heidegger, is not to end technology ... We need to transform our mode of
> Being into one in which technology (in the sense of the machines and
> devices of the modern age) is there for us to enjoy and use, but in which
> technology (in the sense of a mode of Being-in-the-world) is not our only
> or fundamental way of encountering entities."
>
> As I stated before: rejection of the view that science 'provides the
> primary and most significant access to ourselves and the world' (i.e.,
> rejection of 'scientism') is most definitely not automatically
> 'anti-science', and certainly not rejection of the benefits of technology.
>
> Chris Bruce,
> able to write today only because the technology of modern medical science
> saved his life 40 years ago and is currently providing freedom from what
> would otherwise be debilitating pain (from some type of bacterial
> infection),
> yet stoutly maintaining his stance of 'anti-scientism' (NOT
> 'anti-science'), in
> Kiel, Germany.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
> digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
>
--
palma, e TheKwini, KZN
palma
cell phone is 0762362391
*only when in Europe*:
inst. J. Nicod
29 rue d'Ulm
f-75005 paris france
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] what is important is to stop dental science from being appreciated, that can lead to scientism and THAT decreses the sales revenue of the heirs of the sack of turds in lederhosen - palma
