The two candidates, at least seen from afar appear in categories lower than
Nixon/kennedy, where debates were decided by sweat.
It seems to me that the democratic party selected a very strange candidate,
given the antipolitical preference of americans, and the fact that character,
while unreliable indicator is the only indicator of what a candidate does, note
that nobody knew whether either was lying or not (from ‘there were no
classified email messages’ to ‘there is a need of a nuclearized japan’)
Most people I know did not vote precisely because having two bad choices is a
great incentive to not choosing either
From: lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On ;
Behalf Of Omar Kusturica
Sent: Friday, November 25, 2016 6:07 AM
To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: So it goes!
Lol it is not about which server she used, the server was used to conceal the
content. I give up
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 5:05 AM, Mike Geary
<jejunejesuit.geary2@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:jejunejesuit.geary2@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Those emails? What about those emails? Dear God, you fret over which server
Hillary used, but a crook who founded a phony "university" cheating people out
of as much as $35,000, who started and bankrupted 5 businesses leaving his
business partners holding the empty billion dollar bags. A man who wouldn't
release his tax returns because he had not paid any taxes, because he was
"smart" and used his failed businesses to write off all taxes. So, this
dishonest, corrupt, xenophobic, misogynistic, psychotic man with his finger on
the end-of-humanity-button doesn't phase you at all. But Hillary's use of an
unsecure server make you apoplectic, even though the FBI says there was no
crime committed. Well, OK, it's all going to come to an end one way or
another, eh? So why not at the finger of a rude, crude, mentally challenged
megalomaniac?
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 9:32 PM, Omar Kusturica
<omarkusto@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:omarkusto@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Heard anything about those emails ?
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 4:31 AM, Mike Geary
<jejunejesuit.geary2@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:jejunejesuit.geary2@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Omar writes, in re Hillary: "Qualified at killing ? Yes." Please tell me who
Hillary has killed. I'm sure Trump would like to know as well.
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 9:26 PM, Omar Kusturica
<omarkusto@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:omarkusto@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Qualified at killing ? Yes.
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 4:25 AM, John McCreery
<john.mccreery@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:john.mccreery@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Amen. Amen. Amen.
John
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Mike Geary
<jejunejesuit.geary2@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:jejunejesuit.geary2@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Hillary is definitely not a movie star, and I found her speaking voice a bit
grating, but she was far more qualified than any prospective male candidate
willing to go to bat for America and Western Civilization against the Fuehrer
in waiting. In addition, the election of Hillary as President would have been
a powerful rejection of the "pussy-grabbing" misogyny of Trump. But that was
not to be the case. This corrupt, racist, misogynitic, xenophobic,"nasty" man
now stands at the helm of the most powerful nuclear armed nation in the world.
Good luck to us, one and all.
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 8:27 PM, Omar Kusturica
<omarkusto@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:omarkusto@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
We will see. The Democrats should not have allowed a woman like HC to be their
candidate. It may be that the bulk of Trump supporters can be brought to reason,