[lit-ideas] on krP
- From: palma <palmaadriano@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: "lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2014 12:22:43 +0200
Popper stresses that 'knowledge' is a conjecture etc.
does he say that he rejects ant of the standard notions of knowledge?
meaning:
if
x knows that q
ENTAILS
'q' is true (hence, modulo Tarski, q)
x knows conjecturally that q
entails or not that
'q' is true?
On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Donal McEvoy <donalmcevoyuk@xxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> Had a he above site, that Popper does not agree with this theory.
> Nevertheless it not only long antedates H and Davidson (both of whom will
> arguably prove extremely minor figures in terms of anything worthwhile
> philosophically) but may be a much greater and more interesting kind of
> theory.
>
>
>
Other related posts:
