the point is interesting
one way to see what it consist pf:
compare with late Q’ing dinastic fall
1811 1911
was there great art in bejiing?
remind me if you can
what was the great art of the roman?
military architecture? i amnot sarcastic
but need a refresher on time frames
late roman empire= diocletian to fall of istanbul to the ozman?
On Mon, 02 Oct 2017 at 08:06, Omar Kusturica <omarkusto@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Specifically, he suggests that the later Roman empire could not prod*ucepalma, apgs
great creative art. Which may be*
On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 5:59 AM, Omar Kusturica <omarkusto@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Exactly. Good writing style, leading to questionable conclusions. But--
aesthetics is a part of the discussion.
On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 5:53 AM, adriano paolo shaul gershom palma <
palmaadriano@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
gibbon had one advantage i.e. writing well
as for the substace I am unsure about the conditioning
since between say the raj in india and trump in puerto rico it is not
clear to who declines.
slightly better in terms of fall: pseudopowers like comintern
disappeared in pess than one century
and without seneca ( they did invent film though)
On Mon, 02 Oct 2017 at 05:40, Omar Kusturica <omarkusto@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
You might know the title of which book I am referring to. Are we in the--
Western (or even Eastern) Roman empire conditioned to think that we are
living through so many centuries of decline and fall ?
palma, apgs
