[lit-ideas] Re: no reply necessary
- From: Paul Stone <pas@xxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2004 15:15:27 -0400
At 03:03 PM 8/9/2004, you wrote:
>Does that mean that it's necessary that no one reply? Or that it's not
>necessary to reply? If the former, sorry.
I knew you wouldn't let me down. Both is the answer. I originally sent a
note with "test" in the header and it was rejected because the list doesn't
accept anything with 'test' or 'hello' in the subject, I was told.
The reason I sent a test is that for some reason 25 emails that I sent over
the weekend went unanswered (hahahhahahaha). Mo seriously, I sent a post
about an hour ago and it never came through. I have been knocked off the
list for days before without realizing it and I wanted to make sure that
this was not the case. My "no reply necessary" was a delberately ambiguous
substitution for 'test'. Remember, there are no inadvertents (the equivlent
of 'performative' as releates to inadvertent.)
screaming for silence,
p
##########
Paul Stone
pas@xxxxxxxx
Kingsville, ON, Canada
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
Other related posts:
