It's ironic to title this as I did, echoing Somerset and all the Maughams do it, let's do it, let's fall in love -- when 'falling in love' was apparently the one big trauma for Viv (and perhaps the Haigh-Woods). D. Ritchie, re: "Tom and Viv" I haven't seen the movie but I'll look out for it Good. It's incidentally Miranda Richardson -- recently in "Phantom of the Opera" and of course, Potter -- rather than Natasha Richardson who is Vanessa Redgrave's daughter by stage director Tony. More on Vivien Haigh-Wood's influence on Eliot's "marital" (?) wasteland: Tom and Viv | london.broadway.com Yes, just as it also defines Michael Hastings' 1984 play, Tom and Viv, ... dedicated to Viv and that it was she who gave Tom the title for The Waste Land. ... london.broadway.com/story/id/3003789 _Amazon.com: Tom and Viv. (Brian Gilbert, Willem Dafoe, Miranda ..._ (http://www.amazon.com/Gilbert-Willem-Miranda-Richardson-reviews/dp/B00093O8B0) Amazon.com: Tom and Viv. (Brian Gilbert, Willem Dafoe, ... apparently inspired "The Waste Land," and wound up abandoned in a Finsbury Park asylum, ... www.amazon.com/www.amazon.com/<WBR>Gilbert-Willem-Miranda-Richardson-reviews/d p/B0009 The screenplay is by author of controversial books like "The handsomest man in England" -- a bio of R. Brooke, using Yeats' description of Brooke. "Tom and Viv" -- I also owned the bio of Viv -- was sued by the Trustees of Eliot for libel. As I recall, the Haigh-Woods were an ancestral family in Wiltshire, although most reviews concentrate on Viv being a "bright young thing" socialite in 1920s London. What steals the film, too, is Viv's mother "monologue" on how frivolous and superficial and 'riff raff' (her term) the generation of the "Bloomsburies" is. She notably noted a difference between 'the Bloomsbury set' and a previous, perhaps more educated, or respectful of human dignity -- generation. Cheers, JL ************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com