Interesting, Lawrence. The terminology, that is. The British "decent Left" have managed -- not deliberately, probably -- to mislead some decent US liberals into associating with them (for lack, perhaps, of a sufficiently strong social democratic presence in the US). below, > of course denotes Prager >During that period, it was wrong on the Cold War -- it >devoted far more energy to fighting anti-communism >than to fighting communism. moot point. As of course you will know, many on the Left not only did not support the USSR (particularly after 1956) but excoriated it. (Some, of course, never supported it.) Did some of us support Cuba in the face of the US's actions against it? Yes. Did some of us note that the US's actions were a major factor in the rise of communism in Cuba and Cuba's turning to the USSR, perforce? Yes. >It was wrong on welfare. yes well that's his opinion >It was wrong in its demanding less morally and intellectually > from black Americans than from all other Americans. ? I suppose his "intellectually" refers to affirmative action of the kind that put Condi Rice where she is today. "Morally"? that makes no sense to me at all. >It was wrong in advocating bilingual education for > children of immigrants. ? I'm prepared to oppose a minority education that leaves US citizens unable to read/write/speak English, but am a bit puzzled re opposition to bilingual education, one point apart: minority children, bilingually educated, might then be disadvantaged as against monolingual children taught a second language not of their culture. But in practice, I suppose, Spanish -- I take it the beef is about Spanish -- is sufficiently important for that not to be a major concern. >It was wrong in generally holding American society rather > than violent criminals responsible for violent crime The Left objected to imprisonment of offenders? Sounds unlikely to me -- the US is the place where some who call themselves liberals support capital punishment. >It was wrong in imposing its view on abortion on America > through the courts rather than through the democratic process. I take it Prager knows nothing about the political system of the US. sorry, I just can't go on; the man is too silly. I will though note an example of US Left wishful thinking >It was wrong in arguing that America is not based on >Judeo-Christian values, but on secular ones like Western Europe. you should be so lucky! Judy Evans, Cardiff, UK ----- Original Message ----- From: Lawrence Helm To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 3:35 PM Subject: [lit-ideas] The Decent and Indecent Left ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html