[lit-ideas] Re: Sky News "glitch"
- From: Judith Evans <judithevans001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 09:12:53 +0100 (BST)
Yes, it was extraordinary.
>-but for making comments about the woman's body.
I'd have thought they'd be in trouble (over there) for jokes about taking
cocaine!
Judy Evans, Cardiff, UK
--- On Tue, 13/9/11, David Ritchie <ritchierd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: David Ritchie <ritchierd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Sky News "glitch"
To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tuesday, 13 September, 2011, 23:35
On Sep 13, 2011, at 10:23 AM, Judith Evans wrote:
I saw this live, it was hilarious, it probably loses something viewed cold
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7HzYM_qLEnQ
explanation here
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/mediamonkeyblog/2011/sep/13/sky-news-paper-review-giggles?INTCMP=SRCH
Extraordinary. I imagine that they'd all be fired is they worked in the U.S.,
not for laughing--that's probably still allowed--but for making comments about
the woman's body.
David Ritchie,Portland, Oregon
Other related posts:
