--- On Wed, 2/7/08, Andreas Ramos <andreas@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Andreas Ramos <andreas@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > "One can indeed deduce that the sun doesn't go > around the earth. We can test the a theoretical framework within which one of its parts is that the sun is centre of a solar system; but we cannot deduce or induce this framework or this part of it from observation. [Popper et al, et passim]. > As I pointed out for Holmes's concerns, if the earth > was at the center of > the solar system, it'd have to be large enough to > anchor the planets. The idea that there must be an anchor in the system is not itself something we observe, any more than we can observe gravity rather than observe what we hypothesis are the effects of gravity. In terms of observation, and without a theoretical framework with ideas of gravity etc, it would from planet A observing planet B look the same whether B or A (or both) was moving (compare: it would look the same if the station was moving and not the train, or vice versa, given the observer's position). Third, and most important to place Holme's comments in context, it must be borne in mind that he had a very sore elbow at the time due to excessive violining and was doing a lot of coke, so he was not at his best in this exchange being in quite some pain and with a cocaine come-down to deal with into the bargain. The heliocentric system could go suck his oranges in these circumstances. Donal __________________________________________________________ Not happy with your email address?. Get the one you really want - millions of new email addresses available now at Yahoo! http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/ymail/new.html ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html