In a message dated 4/27/2010 6:25:00 P.M. , ritchierd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes: Made more glorious by the removal of a village, which the Duke thought spoiled the view. I have never understood how it was that the Duke of Devon didn't have a seat in Devon. Maybe he did? Maybe he collected seats? Married into them. And so on. ---- The thing is very serious to take it lightly. It all depends on your pedigree. Debrett has: "Devonshire, Duke --" which he traces back to Offa, in Birmingham. "Strictly, his seat is in the Black Country". Devon was "thought of as too low a land for a duke. In those days, the currents of the English channel were even worse than they are today. The family decided to settle in Derbyshire." ---- In general, once you ask or know, it's easy enough. The Duke of Rutland for example, has his seat in Hertfordshire. "The new boundaries to our shires brought about in 1974 was a great blow to the Dukedom of Rutland. Rutland ceased to exist." ---- In general, if you are a male you inherit, if you are otherwise (read: a female) you don't. But, unlike a male, a female can MARRY gentry -- landed gentry. In the case of male marrying landed gentry ABOVE their station, there is always some prejudice that 'he never really belongs'. Noel Coward was very conscious of that: "Gertie Millar married the Viscount of Scarborough and became a Duchess, but there's no duchess I can marry that would make me a lord". He thought that was positive discrimination. ------ Debrett's Peerage contains charts and maps as to what belongs to what, and why. "In principle," they write in their Foreword ("Debrett" is really a collective name), "every bit of land you step your foot on belongs to one duke, or other." ---- The blurb of my copy is a good one. "Buy before the Revolution". J. L. Speranza --- safe at Villa Speranza, Bordighera ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html