I think the point of this might be, because Nepal is so close to China, to prevent the spread of Communism in that area. That mght be the stated point. The real reason is that the U.S. is just a meddling old biddy with a control problem who doesn't learn from its mistakes. -----Original Message----- From: Teemu Pyyluoma <teme17@xxxxxxxxx> Sent: May 14, 2004 5:46 AM To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [lit-ideas] Paranoia or Fighting terrorism in Nepal One more or case of totally clueless US foreign policy. In a nutshell, USA is arming the Nepalese government (latest is $70M US or 20 000 M16s) which is battling demonstations and strikes by pretty much every political party in the country (they want democracy restored) and the Maoist rebels (they are your usual mix of socialists fighting for the poor and plain thugs.) The battle between the rebels and RNA (Royal Nepal Army) is getting increasingly nasty. Like in pretty much every conflict, most of the population is just dodging bullets and praying for peace. So why is Washington involved? Nepal has no natural resources to speak of, and is generally speaking a small insignificant nation in the Himalayas. US ambassador offers the following: "It's a long way from the United States, but we're concerned that areas in Nepal don't get out of control, don't become a vacuum where terrorist groups can move into and use Nepal for whatever." http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/3593849.stm Translation: there is no threat but the new doctrine says that there shall be no place on earth without effective law and order. Pure paranoia. One curious aspect of the conflict is that both Maoists and the government have done everything possible not to hurt foreigners. Tourists still come to the country that is practicly in a civil war, in a bizarre twist rebels asking for donations have actually become a sight! After US announcement on April, Maoists swiftly declared they will be attacking tourist targets starting on June. Which effectively means that the porr country lost its biggest industry. Can anyone explain this to me? The article above mentions some sort of master plan to intensify the conflict in order to get the Maoists back to negotiating table, but having been to the country I second the opinion that the terrain is guerilla heaven, and as such there is little hope for RNA victory. Yours, Teemu Helsinki, Finland __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! - Internet access at a great low price. http://promo.yahoo.com/sbc/ ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html