Thanks to R. Paul for the quotes. Especially interesting seem: _Arist.Pol.1252b5_ (http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cgi-bin/ptext?doc=Perseus:abo:tlg,0086,035:1252b:5&vers=original&word=ba/rba^ros#word1) , _Str.14.2.28_ (http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cgi-bin/ptext?doc=Perseus:abo:tlg,0099,001:14:2:28 &vers=original&word=ba/rba^ros#word1) ; _barbarôn_ (http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cgi-bin/morphindex?lang=greek&lookup=barba/rwn&bytepos=28582479&wordcount=1&embed=2&doc=Perseus:text:1999.04.0057) _Hellênas_ (http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cgi-bin/morphindex?lang=greek&lookup=*(/ellhnas&bytepos=28582479&wordcount=1&embed=2&doc=Perseus:text:1999.04.0057 ) _archein_ (http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cgi-bin/morphindex?lang=greek&lookup=a)/rxein&bytepos=28582479&wordcount=1&embed=2&doc=Perseus:text:1999.04.0057) _eikos_ (http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cgi-bin/morphindex?lang=greek&lookup=ei)ko/s&bytepos=28582479&wordcount=1&embed=2&doc=Perseus:text:1999.04.0057) _E.IA1400_ (http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cgi-bin/ptext?doc=Perseus:abo:tlg,0006,018:1400&vers=original&word=ba/rba^ros#word1) ; b. _kai_ (http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cgi-bin/morphindex?lang=greek&lookup=kai/&bytepos=28582479&wordcount=1&embed=2&doc=Perseus:text:1999.04.0057) _doulon_ (http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cgi-bin/morphindex?lang=greek&lookup=dou=lon&bytepos=28582479&wordcount=1&embed=2&doc=Perseus:text:1999.04.0057) _tauto_ (http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cgi-bin/morphindex?lang=greek&lookup=tau)to/&byte pos=28582479&wordcount=1&embed=2&doc=Perseus:text:1999.04.0057) _phusei_ (http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cgi-bin/morphindex?lang=greek&lookup=fu/sei&bytepos= 28582479&wordcount=1&embed=2&doc=Perseus:text:1999.04.0057) _Arist.Pol. 1252b9_ (http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cgi-bin/ptext?doc=Perseus:abo:tlg,0086,035:1252b:9&vers=original&word=ba/rba^ros#word1) ; _hoi_ (http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cgi-bin/morphindex?lang=greek&lookup=oi(&bytepos=28582479&wordcount=2&emb ed=2&doc=Perseus:text:1999.04.0057) b. _doulikôteroi_ (http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cgi-bin/morphindex?lang=greek&lookup=doulikw/teroi&bytepos=2 8582479&wordcount=1&embed=2&doc=Perseus:text:1999.04.0057) _ta_ (http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cgi-bin/morphindex?lang=greek&lookup=ta/&bytepos=28582479&wordcount=1&embed=2&doc=Perseus:text:1999.04.0057) _êthê_ (http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cgi-bin/morphindex?lang=greek&lookup=h)/qh&bytepos=28582479&wordcount=1&embed=2&doc=Perseus:text:1999.04.0057) _phusei_ (http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cgi-bin/morphindex?lang=greek&lookup=fu/sei&bytepos=28582479&wordcount=2&embed=2&doc=Perseus:text:1999.04.0057) _tôn_ (http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cgi-bin/morphindex?lang=greek&lookup=tw=n&bytepos=28 582479&wordcount=1&embed=2&doc=Perseus:text:1999.04.0057) _Hellênôn_ (http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cgi-bin/morphindex?lang=greek&lookup=*(ellh/nwn&bytepos= 28582479&wordcount=1&embed=2&doc=Perseus:text:1999.04.0057) ib._1285a20_ (http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cgi-bin/ptext?doc=Perseus:abo:tlg,0086,035:1285a:20&; vers=original&word=ba/rba^ros#word1) ; -- where foreigners ('barbarous' [people]) seem to be grouped together with slaves (possibly therefore implying they can, again, be _un_grouped). Also,the OED (under 'barbarous') does agrees with R. Paul's 'received view' that 'barbaros' was originally a neutral, descriptive, non-derogatory term in Greek (with only, I'd say, an implicatural derogation at most). The OED reads: "The sense-development in ancient times was (with the Greeks) ‘foreign, non-Hellenic,’ later ‘outlandish, rude, brutal'" As for value-oriented concepts, I don't see in fact applies. Grice's concoction allows for things like "Conan is a good Barbarian" as not being strictly contradictory. (cf. "a good assassin"). Grice is interested in more abstract cases, like rationality. If 'logos' was however for the Greeks both "word" and "ratio", I think it was fairer to call 'barbarians' 'barbarophones', as Homer did; as implying they were rational-human beings. As anglophones refer to NESBies (Non-English-Speaking-Background) in a descriptive way. :( Grice: "There is a range of cases in which, so far from its being the case that, typically, one learns what it is to be a phi [hellenikos] and then, at the next stage, learns what criteria distinguish a 'good [phi]' from a [phi] which is less good, or no good at all, one needs first to learn what it is to be a _good_ phi, and then subsequently to learn what degree of approximation to being a good phi will qualify an item x as a phi. If the gap between x and good phi's is sufficiently horrendous, then x is debarred from counting as a phi at all, even as a bad phi. I have elsewhere called concepts which exhibit this feature 'value-oriented concepts'. (Reply to Richards, p. 83). In rewrite, we have the idea of a "Greek" (who speaks Greek). That's a value-oriented concept, because "Greek sentence" is a value-oriented concept, and we may define Greek as "utterer of English sentence" (Grice does give the example of 'sentence' as yet another value-oriented concept). For the case of the Barbarian, we are not even sure the Barbarian speaks in sentences, so the value-orientation is murky. Maybe they are just groaning. Or providing onomatopoetic sounds like parrots. Maybe they are not rational. Let's call them "noise-makers" (barbaros). Unfortunatley, my argument flops when we see that someone may count as a _good_ noise-maker (or a good _unintelliglble_ noise maker), rending 'noise-making' yet another value-oriented concept. Anyway, to bed. Good night, JL Cheers, JL ************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com