Eric quotes me as saying:
>>it is equally possible that better working conditions could have been obtained through reasoned discourse.
This was really all I had to say; it should be plain to anyone who doesn't believe in Dialectical Materialism or that human history is is the history of some sort of weird logical inevitability. However, I'll comment briefly below.
Eric rehearses some grim events in the history of American labor relations and Teddy Roosevelt's part in resolving them, and says:
To imagine, as Robert does, that reasoned discourse could have emerged first--before the strikes, the Molly Maguires, the dynamiting, the arrests, the clubbings, the hangings, the forcing of people out into the streets, and BEFORE Teddy Roosevelt's new approach to labor problems--is indeed imaginative. It's also ignores history. Sure they could have reasoned first. Sure. Napoleon could also have invented a nuclear submarine and rock music. We could also have been born as butterflies dreaming we were philosophers.
Unfortunately, this year's Mutton College Summer Logic Camp is closed, in preparation for the annual Fall sheering contest.
Robert Paul Reed College
------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html