[lit-ideas] Re: Lawyers love to argue about words

  • From: "" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender "Jlsperanza" for DMARC)
  • To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 13:56:25 -0500

In a message dated 11/2/2015 12:52:30 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
wokshevs@xxxxxx writes:
Is there a difference between arguing about words and arguing about
concepts?

Don't think so -- in which case, all that McEvoy abbreviated as "CA"
becomes "WA" word analysis -- 'conceptual' sounds more pretentious, and Grice,
being pretentious ('what was HE pretending?', Geary asks*), preferred
'conceptual'. But when titling his posthumous collection ('but he was dead by
then, right?', Geary asks*) he chose "Studies in the way of words" and not
'Studies in the way of concepts'**.

Cheers,

Speranza

* Geary, Memphis Metaphysical Ministry, Occasional Paper No. 61.
* Grice is punning on Locke, 'words', 'way of words' and 'ideas' and 'way
of ideas'. There's a third -- as Yolton notes, 'things' and 'way of things'.
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html

Other related posts: