with one consistent and cohesive difference
Galois used methods and worked in ways nobody understood (after well after
his death in duel)
Goedel used standard methods (the chinese remainder and the decomposition
properties of numbers)
best to you all
<<<<<<<<<<
Quatsch wird gelöscht, ohne gelesen zu werden
真実 пора
Kerem jojjenek maskor es kulonosen masho
הִשְׁתַּדֵּל הִזְדַּקֵּן
palma, a paolo shaul םֹשׁ ְרֵגּ
On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 8:24 PM david ritchie <profdritchie@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On Jun 14, 2021, at 10:42 AM, Eric Dean <ecdean99@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Complaining about that is like complaining about Galois’s finding that
there are no algebraic formulas to solve for the roots of polynomial
equations of degree 5 or higher — another young genius’s stunning result
that settled a millennia-old question.
And by the way, the proof of that result isn’t exactly trivial either.
OK, no more. I just couldn’t resist adding this perhaps cheap shot…
Yay, to hearing another voice in this quiet backwater. No idea what you
guys are talking about—not my department, guv—but happy to see the
exchange. Takes one’s mind off the death of a chicken and the rain and so
on.
Good wishes,
David Ritchie,
Rainland
