[lit-ideas] Imagination

  • From: "Adriano Palma" <Palma@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2011 13:04:16 +0200

** For Your Eyes Only **
** High Priority **
** Reply Requested by 10/9/2011 (Sunday) **

it may help to get into focus that 'a imagines that p' makes perfect
sense.
consider the tokening of the instance
'palma imagines that speranza does not exist & palma imagines that
'speranza' is a database of idiocies masquerading by "griceanisms"
adopting the program IF THERE IS A QUESTION —> CLAIM THERE IS AN
ANSWERBYGRICE'
 
 
you may wonder why it makes sense? well, one take is the following, it
is fully propositional, it is compoistional on p (hence palma might be
wrong about p and speranza may even exist, and so forth)
 
 
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ξε ν’, γγέλλειν Λακεδαιμονίοις     ἀ ὅτι τ δε
κείμεθα, το ς κείνων ῥήμασι πειθόμενοι.
/begin/read__>sig.file: postal address
palma
University of KwaZulu-Natal Philosophy
3rd floor of Memorial Tower Building
Howard College Campus
Durban 4041
South Africa
Tel off: [+27] 031 2601591 (sec: Mrs. Yolanda Hordyk) [+27]
031-2602292
Fax [+27] 031-2603031
mobile 07 62 36 23 91 calling from overseas +[27] 76 2362391
EMAIL: palma@xxxxxxxx
EMAIL: palma@xxxxxxxxxx
MY OFFICE # IS 290@Mtb 
*only when in Europe*: inst. J. Nicod
29 rue d'Ulm
f-75005 paris france
email me for details if needed at palma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
________
This e-mail message (and attachments) is confidential, and/or
privileged and is intended for the
use of the addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient of
this e-mail you must not copy,
distribute, take any action in reliance on it or disclose it to anyone.
Any confidentiality or
privilege is not waived or lost by reason of mistaken delivery to you.
This entity is not responsible for any information not related to the
business of this entity. If you
received this e-mail in error please destroy the original and notify
the sender.

>>> <Jlsperanza@xxxxxxx> 10/8/2011 3:58 PM >>>


In a message dated 10/8/2011 4:45:25 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, 
_jejunejesuit.geary2@xxxxxxxxxx (mailto:jejunejesuit.geary2@xxxxxxxxx) 

quotes from the quote by McCreery:

"the literary imagination, for  Trilling, was preeminently a “moral 
imagination.” Moral imagination—not the  moralistic dicta or
pronouncements evoked 
in present-day debates about same-sex  marriage, abortion, and the
like. 
The true moral imagination transcends such  dogmatic moralizing because
it is 
imbued with “moral realism,” a realism that is  “not the awareness of 
morality itself but of the contradictions, paradoxes, and  dangers of
living the 
moral life.”
It is this combination of “moral realism”  and “moral imagination” that

was the basis of Trilling’s critique of the  “liberal imagination.”
That 
phrase first appeared in the title of the  introductory chapter of his
book on  
E. M. Forster, “Forster and the  Liberal Imagination”:
For all his long commitment to the doctrines of  liberalism Forster is
at 
war with the liberal imagination. Surely if liberalism  has a single 
desperate weakness, it is an inadequacy of imagination: liberalism  is
always being 
surprised. Surprised, because the “liberal mind” has an  unrealistic
and 
simplistic view of morality itself. It thinks that “good is good  and
bad is 
bad. . . . Before the idea of good-and-evil its imagination fails.”  It

cannot accept this “improbable paradox,” a paradox that such “great  
conservative minds” as Johnson, Burke, and Arnold well understood."

The word 'imagination' -- despite Dame Mary Warnock, in England -- has 

little import in philosophy.

"A imagines that p"

does not make REAL direct sense. Consider:

"John imagined the sky is  blue."

The idea of _moral_ imagination is thus pre-Humean: there are
"imagines"  
(singular 'imago') and this can be moral! Absurd! This results in a 
_r
epresentationalist_ view of stuff. As Palma notes, what's imaginative
about  
'withdrawal'? What is the _moral_ agent who withdraws from something  
_imagining_?! Nothing!

Hence, by reductio ad absurdum, the misuses, literary and other, of
that  
morally VERY AMBIGUOUS character, E. M. Forster, the closet gay who
wrote a  
boring unpublished novel about coming out!

---- Cheers,

Speranza

------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html

Please find our Email Disclaimer here: http://www.ukzn.ac.za/disclaimer/

Other related posts: