The Augean Stables (Or, How to Bed an Implicature) "I shall have an Augean stable to clean there." P. SCHUYLER (1775) in Sparks Corr. Amer. Rev. (1853) I. 4, "I shall have an Augean stable to clean there." Thanks to John McCreery for the correction. It all originated when Geary said he had 'a couple (_two?_) jobs' which will take him like 'a _couple_ (two?) weeks. This reminded me of Heracles and his 'labours' ('jobs' -- his twelve _odd_ jobs), including indeed the Augean stables. Incidentally, Grice uses this example as a case of ... well, let me quote him: "The question which at this point particularly best me was whether it is required that a conversational impllicature should be given maximal scope." "when a sentence which used in isolation standardly carries a conversational implicature p+>q is EMBEDDED in a certain linguistic context, for example appears within the scope of the negation sign ~(p+>q) must the embedding operator (~) be interpreted only as governing not only the _sense_ portrayed by the logical form, but also the conversational implicature of the EMBEDDED sentence?" "Only if an embedding operator (such as ~) may on occasion be taken as governing not just the _sense_ portrayed by the logical form, but also the conversational implicature standardly carried by the embedde sentence can my first version of my account of 'the' and 'if' be made to work." "It certainly does not seem reasonable to subscribe to an ABSOLUTE ban on the possibility that an EMBEDDING locution may govern the standard conversational implicature rather than the sense conveyed by its logical form of the logical form." "If a friend were to tell me that he had spent the summer clearning the Augean stables, it would be _unreasonable_ of me to respond that he could not have been doing that since he spent the summer in Seattle and the Augean stables are not in Seattle". [but in Elis-on-Alpheos, Greece, where Augeias kept his 3,000 oxen] "But where the limits of a license may lie which allows us to relate embedding operators to the standard implicature rather than to the sense conveyed by the logical form, I have to admit that I do not know." So from what I understand, Grice is saying that if a friend says (1) I have spent the summer cleaning the Augean stables. the friend, unless he _is_ Heracles_ has to be interpreted as being engaged in an 'engaging' (if I may repeat) _hyperbole_ -- i.e. where only the conversational implicature (what the dictionary has as 'fig[urative]' has a role and totally overrides the sense and logical form which would include something like _a dyadic_ relation, "C" -- for 'clean' a deictic reference to "I" a definite description for 'the stables' a marker for the plural in 'stables' the proper-name behind 'Augean' S(t1>t2 C(I, (i)stable-Augean), summer. This _is_ processed, but in contrast with other implicatures where the logical form is retained, it is here overriden by the implicature. More on the logical form below, and thanks again to McCreery. Perhaps someone may explain to me the 'implicature' behind the first idiomatic use of this in the OED, by an American (?) uttered in 1775 -- one year before the Indepence. Cheers, J. L. Speranza Buenos Aires, Argentina ----- [f. L. <NOas, Gr. : see -AN]. Abominably filthy; i.e. resembling the stable of Augeas, a fabulous king of Elis, which contained 3,000 oxen, and had been uncleansed for 30 years, when Hercules, by turning the river Alpheus through it, purified it in a single day. 1599 _MARSTON_ (http://0-dictionary.oed.com.csulib.ctstateu.edu/help/bib/oed2-m2.html#marston) Sco. Villanie III. Proem 210 To purge this Augean oxstall from foule sinne. 1775 P. SCHUYLER in Sparks Corr. Amer. Rev. (1853) I. 4, "I shall have an Augean stable to clean there." 1866 _ALGER_ (http://0-dictionary.oed.com.csulib.ctstateu.edu/help/bib/oed2-a.html#alger) Solit. Nat. & Man IV. 389 "To cleanse the augean bosom of the world by turning through it a river of pure enthusiasm." ************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com