[lit-ideas] Re: Husserliana
- From: Omar Kusturica <omarkusto@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: "lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2014 12:31:30 -0800 (PST)
As I understand, Heidegger was asked by the editor to remove the dedication and
did not completely remove it but had it inside the book. But I am no expert,
it's just what the Wiki says.
O.K.
On Sunday, February 2, 2014 9:18 PM, "cblists@xxxxxxxx" <cblists@xxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Re:
> Heidegger was never wrong about Husserl
Cf.:
Finally, there is the matter of Heidegger's treatment of his former teacher,
Edmund Husserl. Husserl founded the philosophical school of phenomenology and
had an international reputation equal to that of Heidegger. Husserl was also a
Jew. He fell under the edict of the racial cleansing laws and was denied the
use of the University library at Freiburg. ... Apologists for Heidegger ...
have sought to exonerate him from any personal responsibility for the fate of
Husserl. They point out that Heidegger never signed any edicts specifically
limiting Husserl's access to the university facilities. Yet this narrowly
construed defense hardly absolves Heidegger of his complicity as an agent in
carrying out Nazi anti-Jewish edicts, edicts that he knew would have a
devastating impact on former friends and colleagues. Nor is any explanation
possible that would redeem Heidegger from the shameful act of removing his
dedication to his mentor Husserl from Being and Time
when that work was reissued in 1941.
from https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2000/04/heid-a03.html
Chris Bruce
Kiel, Germany
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
Other related posts:
