[lit-ideas] Re: How the US is losing in Iraq

  • From: "Andreas Ramos" <andreas@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 12:10:08 -0700

Lawrence doesn't understand what is going on in Iraq. He somehow thinks all of the Iraqi are fighting the USA. He doesn't realize there is a civil war going on. He doesn't understand who is attacking the US forces in Iraq, and he certainly doesn't understand their motives.


The IEDs are a local weapon, just as guerilla insurgency is a local tactic. Guerillas can only fight within their supporting culture. But Lawrence doesn't understand this as well.

But none of this matters to Lawrence. He only cares about a "clash of civilizations" and other racial ideas to justify his assault on other cultures.

yrs,
andreas
www.andreas.com


----- Original Message ----- From: "Lawrence Helm" <lawrencehelm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2007 11:07 AM
Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: How the US is losing in Iraq


Andreas? Which Andreas? Is this the same Andreas who just yesterday wrote:




What are all of those "150 million" committed Jihadists doing?



- Once every six or nine months, four or six Muslims try to blow up a bus or
whatever. Occassionally they do it, but mostly, they get caught.



- A few thousand are in Iraq, along with several tens of thousands of Iraqi
Shiites and Sunni who are fighting a civil war with each other and
occassionally take shots at Americans.



- They burn effigies whenever a Dane draws another cartoon.



That's their level of commitment? They can get all upset over the USA, but
that doesn't even lead to action. And because they have no infrastructure,
they can't do anything that takes longer than a few days.





This can't be the same Andreas!  For if he scoffs at the Jihadists as a
fictitious enemy one day, how can he claim the they are defeating us the
next?



Lawrence





-----Original Message-----
From: lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Andreas Ramos
Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2007 9:27 AM
To: Lit-Ideas
Subject: [lit-ideas] How the US is losing in Iraq



A good set of articles in today's Washington Post on how IEDs have become

the major weapon against the US military in Iraq. Here are some quotes.



----------------



"We all drank the Kool-Aid," said a retired Army officer who worked on

counter-IED issues for three years. "We believed (...) because the United

States was the technology powerhouse, the solution to this problem would

come from science. That attitude was 'All we have to do is throw technology

at it and the problem will go away.' The day we lose a war, it will be to

guys with spears and loincloths, because they're not tied to technology. And


we're kind of close to being there."



More than 81,000 IED attacks have occurred in Iraq, including 25,000 so far

this year, according to U.S. military sources.



Bombs detonated by radio-controlled triggers, which had become the most

prominent killer of U.S. forces, today amount to only 10 percent of all IEDs


in Iraq after the deployment of 30,000 jammers, with more on the way.



The 100 or so daily IED "events" -- bombs that blow up, as well as those

discovered before they detonate -- have doubled since the 50 per day typical


in January 2006. The 3,229 IEDs recorded in March of this year put the

monthly total in Iraq above 3,000 for the first time, a threshold also

exceeded in May and June. "The numbers," one Army colonel said, "are

astonishing."



Each week, the cat-and-mouse game expanded. When coalition convoys routinely


began stopping 300 yards from a suspected IED, insurgents planted easily

spotted hoax bombs to halt traffic, then detonated explosives that had been

hidden where a convoy would most likely pull over.



--------------



How did this happen? Miscalculation. The US military is built to carry out

mechanized land war. They had no preparation to deal with a guerilla

insurgency. The Iraqi, unable to carry out a land war, developed a new

strategy based on low-level technology and local infrastructure.



As long as the US continues to drive around in vehicles, the Iraqi will use

more IEDs. The US has spent $15 billion to stop IEDs, yet the number of IED

continues to grow. The Iraqi can modify the devices faster than the US can

come up with solutions, and they can deploy these in overwhelming numbers.



How to deal with this? Change the game.



yrs,

andreas

www.andreas.com





------------------------------------------------------------------

To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,

digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html



------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html

Other related posts: