Dear David and Eric,. thank you for your comments. Both of you seem to assume that I have some awareness of what I'm doing. I don't. David's comment -- "I like the poem, particularly the zero sum game, nothing to the visitors, nothing to the victors, nothing to the victims. Yes, that's about it." -- I like that comment. I just wish that it was in my what I had intended. I have no idea what I intended. I just like the sound of it at the moment. But I like the fact that you made the poem your own. That's what art's all about, I think. Eric's comment that I don't leave enough mystery in my writing is, I hate to admit, spot on. But I can explain that. I usually have no idea where any poem is going or what it's about and so I don't trust anything I write and always feel compelled to justify the whole enterprise. Find some moral in it. Maybe it's a Catholic thing. Mike Geary Memphis My friend On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 10:53 PM, David Ritchie <ritchierd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote: > > On Jun 14, 2010, at 7:40 PM, Mike Geary wrote: > > >> So let's get back to the how of poetry writing. Lesson 1: steal. A dear >> friend of mine in college, a very talented writer who converted his talent >> for writing into a talent for courting rich women -- and successfully!. >> > > I had just such a friend, funniest guy, wrote admirable letters some of > which I still have. And what did he become? An academic administrator, > joined the dark side of the Force. Says he believes in systems and > outcomes, control of the curriculum, that whole bit. You should have seen > his face when they wanted to investigate his footnotes. > > I like the poem, particularly the zero sum game, nothing to the visitors, > nothing to the victors, nothing to the victims. Yes, that's about it. > > David Ritchie, > Portland, Oregon > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, > digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html >