[lit-ideas] "Have You Stopped Missing Your Wife?"

  • From: Jlsperanza@xxxxxxx
  • To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 12:19:09 EDT

In a message dated 4/7/2009 11:48:08 A.M.  Eastern Daylight Time, 
teme17@xxxxxxxxx writes:
It is common to point out  texts that were obviously written by a men. It 
works both ways.
Donna Leon,  Blood from a Stone, reading a translation so reverse-translated 
and with  apologies to both Donna Leon and list members: "From time time 
black  men said  something to each other, talked this and that, the stuff men 
at  work talk to kill time: how someone hadn't slept well, that it was  
freezing, how someone hoped his son would pass entrance exams, of how much they 
 
missed their wives."
Having spent most of my adult life on boring  jobs while chatting with other 
men on topics ranging from ice hockey to  Tractatus, computers to growing 
potatoes, I can testify that the subject of  wives is rarely discussed, and 
never 
have I heard about how much they are  missed. On the other hand, to answer the 
question on what I am reading, I could  very well reply that on a lazy Sunday 
afternoon my wife handed me Murder at Aqua  Alta, and might as well given an 
apple to go along with it. I still  don't know if actually like the book, 
but I am addicted.  

----
 
Dunno. I would have to read the original. Also the gender of Donna Leon. Is  
she male?
 
Anyway, as Geary's novella shows, there's diegesis and personal  narrrator.

The "voice" (or phony) of the narrator, is not the same as the  narratee's -- 
so Donna is obviously _not_ Donna, but the narrator. And she may  be 
narrating in an ironic perspective. I.e. where "missing their wives" has to  be 
understood with the equivalent of the emoticon
 
; - (
 
or some such.
 
-----
 
Grice used a lot of examples referring to his wife. There's this  other,
 
     A: Where is your wife?
     B: She is in the kitchen or in the living  room.
 
As D. Smith notes in _Elements of Logic_, if we assume a door communicating  
both rooms, the above does _not_ implicate, "but not both". 
 
O. T. O. H., the implicature of the header is _conventional_ and  
non-detachable. (It's discussed in online "The causal theory of perception",  
along with 
the wife's whereabouts example.
 
Cheers,
 
JL
**************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy 
steps! 
(http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1221421323x1201417385/aol?redir=http:%2F%2Fwww.freecreditreport.com%2Fpm%2Fdefault.aspx%3Fsc%3D668072%26hmpgID
%3D62%26bcd%3DAprilfooterNO62)
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html

Other related posts: