Oh sure! Go ahead and blow our cover. (There are privacy laws, Wager.) Walter O. Your friendly neighborhood Rusian Orthodox, heterosexual, World Federalist (but I don't want to talk about it.) Quoting John Wager <john.wager1@xxxxxxxxxxx>: > wokshevs@xxxxxx wrote: > >> Perhaps it is indeed the case that neither politics, nor religion nor > sexual > >> appetites should be permitted past the walls of the academy. Only those of > a > >> mathematical or moral disposition need apply. > >> > > > > True, sexual appetites do not interest Philosopher Kings. Perhaps that's > > because they have none?? > > Robert Paul > > > I always thought that the reason academic philosophers don't discuss > these three issues--politics, religion, and sex--was that these were the > only three things > that academic philosophers actually DID anything about, and that their > "professional" duties took them to things that they had no direct > experience of. > > > > Robert Paul > > > > WO: I of course intended to write "sexual orientation, if any." Surely > Socrates would agree, nicht wahr? > > > I thought that the Internet and on-line chats had made the whole concept > of multiple "sexual orientations" obsolete. > > Isn't the only contemporary sexual orientation now "seated?" > > -- > ------------------------------------------------- > "Never attribute to malice that which can be > explained by incompetence and ignorance." > ------------------------------------------------- > John Wager j.wager@xxxxxxxxxxx > Forest Park, IL, USA > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, > digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html > ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html