[lit-ideas] Fwd: Re: Don't Stand So Close to Me

  • From: JimKandJulieB@xxxxxxx
  • To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 13:51:58 EST

<BR><BR><BR>**************************************<BR> AOL now offers free 
email to everyone.  Find out more about what's free from AOL at 
http://www.aol.com.
--- Begin Message ---
  • From: JimKandJulieB@xxxxxxx
  • To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 01:56:25 EST
<<That older men can use their position and influence to seduce a  younger 
woman can be dastardly caddish behavior, I'll grant you -- but not  illegal or 
necessarily immoral assuming the woman is of legal  age.  >>
 
"Position and influence" speaks of power; and power ... well, you  know....
 
Julie Krueger

========Original  Message========     Subj: [lit-ideas] Re: Don't Stand So 
Close to Me  Date: 1/28/2007 5:47:04 P.M. Central Standard Time  From: 
_atlas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (mailto:atlas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)   To: 
_lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
(mailto:lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)   Sent on:    
JK:
 
>>And if the girl/woman doesn't have a choice?
 
Choice as to what?  Sexual activity?  Then it's rape  or at minimum sexual 
assualt.    If it's with a girl, then it's  statutory rape, whether she chooses 
to or not.  Why do you ask such a  question?  Is there something in my post 
that suggests I approve of men  "having their way" with women?  I don't 
understand.
 
 
Mike Geary
Memphis
 
 


----- Original Message ----- 
From:  _JimKandJulieB@xxxxxxxx (mailto:JimKandJulieB@xxxxxxx)  
To: _lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (mailto:lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)  
Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2007 5:28  PM
Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Don't Stand So  Close to Me


And if the girl/woman doesn't have a choice?
 
Julie Krueger

========Original  Message========     Subj: [lit-ideas] Re: Don't Stand So 
Close to Me  Date: 1/28/2007 4:29:06 P.M. Central Standard Time  From: 
_atlas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (mailto:atlas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)   To: 
_lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
(mailto:lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)   Sent on:     
A.A:
>>  Sexual  pleasure with an older man as opposed to someone her own age?  
You have  to be kidding.<<


It seems to me that where and with whom a woman seeks her pleasure is  her 
business, not yours.  If she prefers older men or younger men or mean  men or 
black men or red men or even white men, or rich men or  cowboys or gay cowboys, 
then that's her business.  That older men  can use their position and 
influence to seduce a younger woman can be  dastardly caddish behavior, I'll 
grant you 
-- but not illegal or necessarily  immoral assuming the woman is of legal 
age.  Women, like  men, can behave in strange ways.  Ask any rock 'n roll  
star.  
Many women are drawn like moths to the bright lights  of success.  Why else 
would men seek out success?  For men, at  least, it's all about sex, Andy.  I 
hate to tell you that, but it's time  you knew.  Everything a man does, he does 
for pussy -- well, about  ten per cent do it for dick -- Freudian?  No.  More 
 Heffnerian.  I've yet to find any male behavior that can't ultimately be  
reduced to the desire to fuck.  And I stand four square against  Reductionism!  
It's an extremely complex universe, after all --  except when it comes to male 
motivations.  And I personally find  nothing wrong with that.  I find it 
amusing to realize that  I'm writing this right now in hopes I'll get laid down 
the  road.      

Omar  in his post informed me that the student he was writing about was not, 
like my  student, 15 years old, but a college student and that she was not  
inexperienced in things sexual, to which you responded: " Not inexperienced is  
sometimes known as sexual abuse of children."   My question is  what the hell 
does that have to do with anything?  If you want  to preach against sexual 
abuse of children, then start up an new  thread.  I'll support you in that.  I 
can name  priests' names. : )   Who I wonder are you accusing  of sexual abuse 
of children -- Omar or me or both?  I never touched my  student (and today 
we're good, close friends, she teaches theater in  Montreal)  and Omar's 
student 
certainly wasn't a child.  So  what was your point exactly?  I understand that 
you're opposed to child  sexual abuse.  So are we all.  So are we all.
 
 

>> That's a clear power differential that speaks  for itself I think, but, of 
course, not to you.  It must be nice to live  in a world where things just 
happen.  Not happen for a reason, but just  happen.<<
 
 
I have no idea where this is coming from or how you could  draw that 
conclusion from anything I've ever written.  
 
 
 
>> By psychohistorians, but you don't believe in the  unconscious, so why are 
you bothering me? <<
 
 
Which psychohistorians?   Names please.  What  do you mean I don't believe in 
the unconscious?  I've told you more than  once that I believe first and 
foremost in the unconscious,  or  subconscious, which, I assume, is what you 
mean. 
 We live our  subconsciously, consciousness is what we amuse ourselves with.  
 



A.A.  Someone who does no thinking would be envious, no  surprise there.   


A hit!  A very palpable hit!
 
 
Mike Geary
Memphis
 
 

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Andy Amago 
To:  lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2007 1:41 PM
Subject:  [lit-ideas] Re: Don't Stand So Close to Me


-----Original  Message----- 
From: Mike Geary 
Sent: Jan 28, 2007 12:15 PM 
To:  lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Don't Stand So Close to  Me 

 


As to Andy's comments:

> Not inexperienced  is sometimes known as sexual abuse of children, 

It's also sometimes  (and far more commonly) known as "not inexperienced".  I 
dare say most  college age women have some experience with sexual pleasure.  
A sin, I  know.  And get this, not all children are sexually abused.  I know  
it will come as a shock to Andy, who has never raised a child, but in fact  
most children are not sexually abused.   



A.A.   Sexual pleasure with an older man as opposed to someone her own age?  
You  have to be kidding.  That's a clear power differential that speaks for  
itself I think, but, of course, not to you.  It must be nice to live in a  
world where things just happen.  Not happen for a reason, but just  happen.   



> Psychohistorically it's  suggested that countries have "maturity levels".

Suggested by  whom?  Do you seriously believe that China lacks  maturity?


In any case, what do you mean by "China"?   China has 1.3 billion people in 
it.   Women were treated literally  (literally) like nonentities before Mao 
made everyone equal, which worked  about as well as emancipating the slaves 
here. 
 There's still much hatred  against women in China.  So, yes, the maturity 
level there is not high  generally speaking, or you can explain to me why women 
need to be hated.   Iris Chang talked about the things she saw done to women 
in the provinces that  can't be repeated on this list.  Women in China's cities 
are divorcing  men like crazy and who can blame them?  

Macho cultures are  generally immature.  Men who beat women are immature.  
Women who hit  men are immature.  Boys are taught to be men by being beaten 
(the 
Boy  Named Sue), so they will beat those smaller than themselves.  That's  
called macho.  Machismo is a mask.   Mexico is a macho culture,  so yes, 
generally, they're less mature than a nonmacho culture.  Likewise  Islamic 
cultures 
where women are obsessed over, "protected", which is to say,  kept stuck to the 
soles of men's shoes, are very immature.  Immaturity is  accompanied by a lot 
of anger; what was the reaction to the cartoons?   Western cultures are 
somewhat more mature to the extent that there is more  equality among sexes, 
but 
Western cultures did the schoolyard counterpart to  the Islam rage by goading 
it.  We here in the U.S. took a huge step  backwards with the invasion of Iraq, 
but generally we treat children better,  and women are now mostly equal, which 
means we are more mature as a culture,  yes.  As we grow up we're taught that 
we don't fight to solve problems  (even as we're beaten in the teaching), but 
how are we today solving  problems?  By declaring war.  So, the world as a 
very, very long way  to go in the maturation process, but at least we've made 
some progress here by  recognizing child abuse as bad instead of the normal 
it's 
been for most of  history and still is in much if not most of the world.   




> Clearly those who need disparities and power  differentials in marriages 
are not at the high end of  maturity.


Clearly?  I envy Andy the clarity of his  thinking.


A.A.  Someone who does no thinking would be envious,  no surprise there.    


------------------------------------------------------------------  To change 
your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest  on/off), 
visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html 

<BR><BR><BR>**************************************<BR> AOL now offers free 
email to everyone.  Find out more about what's free from AOL at 
http://www.aol.com.

--- End Message ---

Other related posts:

  • » [lit-ideas] Fwd: Re: Don't Stand So Close to Me