[lit-ideas] Evolutionary Theory from Empedocles to Grice -- and back

  • From: "" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender "Jlsperanza@xxxxxxx" for DMARC)
  • To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 18:31:50 -0400 (EDT)

My last post today!
 
In a message dated 5/23/2014 4:01:53 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
lawrencehelm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
"Students disrupted Wilson’s lectures and  harassed even Hamilton and 
Trivers."
 
I was amused by that! O. T. O. H., I guess Grice's lectures at Harvard (the 
 bi-annual Philosophy and Psychology William James series) went peacefully.
 
Helm goes on to quote from Wade:
 
"By breaking out of the specialist frameworks in which philosophers and  
psychologists had long imprisoned the study of morality, De Waal established  
that morality is a biological behavior and that evolution is the only 
framework  in which the origins of morality can be addressed."
 
One may take this as a simplistic account of what philosophers (or moral  
philosophers even -- but as Grice say, "Philosophy, like virtue, is entire") 
are  up to. Any naturalistic framework (vide G. E. Moore on the naturalistic 
fallacy  may be reinterpreted 'evolutionarily', if that's the right adverb.
 
For one, Grice is thus described as 'evolutionary' in that his ethical  
views fit the 'Ideal Observer' framework (cfr. Intelligent Design). And for 
that  matter, it all seems to have started way before Darwin's Descent or 
Origin, and  with Empedocles. From Wikipedia:
 
Empedocles attempted to explain the separation of elements, the formation  
of earth and sea, of Sun and Moon, of atmosphere.
 
Empedocles also deals with the first origin of plants and animals, and  
with the physiology of humans. 
 
As the elements entered into combinations, there appeared strange results – 
 heads without necks, arms without shoulders.
 
Then as these fragmentary structures met, there were seen horned heads on  
human bodies, bodies of oxen with human heads, and figures of double sex.
 
But most of these products of natural forces disappeared as suddenly as  
they arose.
 
Only in those rare cases where the parts were found to be adapted to each  
other, did the complex structures last. 
 
Thus the organic universe sprang from spontaneous aggregations, which  
suited each other as if this had been intended. 
 
Soon various influences reduced the creatures of double sex to a male and a 
 female, and the world was replenished with organic life. 
 
It is possible to see this theory as an anticipation of Darwin's theory of  
natural selection, although Empedocles was not trying to explain evolution 
--  since his disciples were not expected to be _expecting_ that 
explanation. (And  as Grice would later say, "Problem with Empedocles's 
explanation is 
that it  itself needs an explanation").
 
Cheers,
 
Speranza
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html

Other related posts:

  • » [lit-ideas] Evolutionary Theory from Empedocles to Grice -- and back