This seems fairly unprecedented..... <<Retired Officials Say Bush Must Go The 26 ex-diplomats and military leaders say his foreign policy has harmed=20 national security. Several served under Republicans. =20 WASHINGTON " =14" A group of 26 former senior diplomats and military officia= ls,=20 several appointed to key positions by Republican Presidents Ronald Reagan an= d=20 George H.W. Bush, plans to issue a joint statement this week arguing that=20 President George W. Bush has damaged America's national security and should=20= be=20 defeated in November. The group, which calls itself Diplomats and Military Commanders for Change,=20 will explicitly condemn Bush's foreign policy, according to several of those= =20 who signed the document. "It is clear that the statement calls for the defeat of the administration,"= =20 said William C. Harrop, the ambassador to Israel under President Bush's fath= er=20 and one of the group's principal organizers. Those signing the document, which will be released in Washington on=20 Wednesday, include 20 former U.S. ambassadors, appointed by presidents of bo= th parties,=20 to countries including Israel, the former Soviet Union and Saudi Arabia. Others are senior State Department officials from the Carter, Reagan and=20 Clinton administrations and former military leaders, including retired Marin= e Gen.=20 Joseph P. Hoar, the former commander of U.S. forces in the Middle East under= =20 President Bush's father. Hoar is a prominent critic of the war in Iraq. Some of those signing the document =E2=80=94 such as Hoar and former Air For= ce Chief=20 of Staff Merrill A. McPeak =E2=80=94 have identified themselves as supporter= s of Sen.=20 John F. Kerry, the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee. But most hav= e=20 not endorsed any candidate, members of the group said. It is unusual for so many former high-level military officials and career=20 diplomats to issue such an overtly political message during a presidential=20 campaign. A senior official at the Bush reelection campaign said he did not wish to=20 comment on the statement until it was released. But in the past, administration officials have rejected charges that Bush ha= s=20 isolated America in the world, pointing to countries contributing troops to=20 the coalition in Iraq and the unanimous passage last week of the U.N.=20 resolution authorizing the interim Iraqi government. One senior Republican strategist familiar with White House thinking said he=20 did not think the group was sufficiently well-known to create significant=20 political problems for the president. The strategist, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, also said the=20 signatories were making an argument growing increasingly obsolete as Bush le= ans more=20 on the international community for help in Iraq. "Their timing is a little off, particularly in the aftermath of the most=20 recent U.N. resolution," the strategist said. "It seems to me this is a coll= ection=20 of resentments that have built up, but it would have been much more powerful= =20 months ago than now when even the president's most disinterested critics wou= ld=20 say we have taken a much more multilateral approach" in Iraq. But those signing the document say the recent signs of cooperation do not=20 reverse a basic trend toward increasing isolation for the U.S. "We just felt things were so serious, that America's leadership role in the=20 world has been attenuated to such a terrible degree by both the style and th= e=20 substance of the administration's approach," said Harrop, who served as=20 ambassador to four African countries under Carter and Reagan. "A lot of people felt the work they had done over their lifetime in trying t= o=20 build a situation in which the United States was respected and could lead th= e=20 rest of the world was now undermined by this administration =E2=80=94 by the= =20 arrogance, by the refusal to listen to others, the scorn for multilateral=20 organizations," Harrop said. Jack F. Matlock Jr., who was appointed by Reagan as ambassador to the Soviet= =20 Union and retained in the post by President Bush's father during the final=20 years of the Cold War, expressed similar views. "Ever since Franklin Roosevelt, the U.S. has built up alliances in order to=20 amplify its own power," he said. "But now we have alienated many of our clos= est=20 allies, we have alienated their populations. We've all been increasingly=20 appalled at how the relationships that we worked so hard to build up have si= mply=20 been shattered by the current administration in the method it has gone about= =20 things." The GOP strategist noted that many of those involved in the document claimed= =20 their primary expertise in the Middle East and suggested a principal=20 motivation for the statement might be frustration over Bush's effort to fund= amentally=20 reorient policy toward the region. "For 60 years we believed in quote-unquote stability at the price of liberty= ,=20 and what we got is neither liberty nor stability," the strategist said. "So=20 we are taking a fundamentally different approach toward the Middle East. Tha= t=20 is a huge doctrinal shift, and the people who have given their lives, career= s=20 to building the previous foreign policy consensus, see this as a direct=20 intellectual assault on what they have devoted their lives to. And it is. We= think=20 what a lot of people came up with was a failure =E2=80=94 or at least, in th= e present=20 world in which we live, it is no longer sustainable." Sponsors of the effort counter that several in the group have been involved=20 in developing policy affecting almost all regions of the globe. The document will echo a statement released in April by a group of high-leve= l=20 former British diplomats condemning Prime Minister Tony Blair for being too=20 closely aligned to U.S. policy in Iraq and Israel. Those involved with the n= ew=20 group said their effort was already underway when the British statement was=20 released. The signatories said Kerry's campaign played no role in the formation of=20 their group. Phyllis E. Oakley, the deputy State Department spokesman during= =20 Reagan's second term and an assistant secretary of state under Clinton, said= she=20 suspected "some of them [in the Kerry campaign] may have been aware of it,"=20= but=20 that "the campaign had no role" in organizing the group. Stephanie Cutter, Kerry's communications director, also said that the Kerry=20 campaign had not been involved in devising the group's statement. The document does not explicitly endorse Kerry, according to those familiar=20 with it. But some individual signers plan to back the Democrat, and others=20 acknowledge that by calling for Bush's removal, the group effectively is urg= ing=20 Americans to elect Kerry. "The core of the message is that we are so deeply concerned about the curren= t=20 direction of American foreign policy =E2=80=A6 that we think it is essential= for the=20 future security of the United States that a new foreign policy team come in,= "=20 said Oakley. Much of the debate over the document in the days ahead may pivot on the=20 extent to which it is seen as a partisan document. A Bush administration ally said that the group failed to recognize how the=20 Sept. 11 attacks required significant changes in American foreign policy.=20 "There's no question those who were responsible for policies pre-9/11 are de= nying=20 what seems as the obvious =E2=80=94 that those policies were inadequate," sa= id Cliff=20 May, president of the conservative advocacy group Foundation for the Defense= of=20 Democracies. "This seems like a statement from 9/10 people [who don't see] the importance= =20 of 9/11 and the way that should have changed our thinking." Along with Hoar and McPeak, others who have signed it are identified with th= e=20 Democratic Party. Adm. William J. Crowe Jr., though named chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staf= f=20 under Reagan, supported Clinton in 1992. Crowe has endorsed Kerry. Retired=20 Adm. Stansfield Turner served as Carter's director of central intelligence a= nd ha s also endorsed Kerry. Matlock said he was a registered Democrat during most= =20 of his foreign service career, though he voted for Reagan in 1984 and the=20 elder Bush twice and now is registered as an independent. Several on the group's list were appointed to their most important posts=20 under Reagan and the elder Bush. These include Matlock and Harrop, as well a= s=20 Arthur A. Hartman, who served as Reagan's ambassador to the Soviet Union fro= m 1981=20 through 1987; H. Allen Holmes, an assistant secretary of state under Reagan;= =20 and Charles Freeman, ambassador to Saudi Arabia under the elder Bush. Many on the list have not been previously identified with any political caus= e=20 or party. Several "are the kind who have never spoken out before," said Jame= s=20 Daniel Phillips, former ambassador to Burundi and the Congo. Oakley, Harrop and Matlock said the effort began this year. Matlock said it=20 was sparked by conversations among "colleagues who had served in senior=20 positions around the same time, most of them for the Reagan administration a= nd for=20 the first Bush administration." Oakley said frustration over the Iraq war was "a large part" of the impetus=20 for the statement, but the criticism of President Bush "goes much deeper." The group's complaint about Bush's approach largely tracks Kerry's contentio= n=20 that the administration has weakened American security by straining=20 traditional alliances and shifting resources from the war against Al Qaeda t= o the=20 invasion of Iraq. Oakley said the statement would argue that, "Unfortunately the tough stands=20 [Bush] has taken have made us less secure. He has neglected the war on=20 terrorism for the war in Iraq. And while we agree that we are in unprecedent= ed times=20 and we face challenges we didn't even know about before, these challenges=20 require the cooperation of other countries. We cannot do it by ourselves." The signatories While not explicitly endorsing Sen. John F. Kerry for president, 26 former=20 diplomats and military officials, including many who served in Republican=20 administrations, have a signed a statement calling for the defeat of Preside= nt Bush=20 in November. Their names and some of the posts they have held are:=20 Avis T. Bohlen =E2=80=94 assistant secretary of State for arms control, 1999= -2002;=20 deputy assistant secretary of State for European affairs 1989-1991.=20 Retired Adm. William J. Crowe Jr. =E2=80=94 chairman, President's Foreign=20 Intelligence Advisory Committee, 1993-94; ambassador to Britain, 1993-97; ch= airman of the=20 Joint Chiefs of Staff, 1985-89.=20 Jeffrey S. Davidow =E2=80=94 ambassador to Mexico, 1998-2002; assistant secr= etary of=20 State for Inter-American Affairs, 1996=20 William A. DePree =E2=80=94 ambassador to Bangladesh, 1987-1990.=20 Donald B. Easum =E2=80=94 ambassador to Nigeria, 1975-79.=20 Charles W. Freeman Jr. =E2=80=94 assistant secretary of Defense, Internation= al=20 Security Affairs, 1993-94; ambassador to Saudi Arabia, 1989-1992.=20 William C. Harrop =E2=80=94 ambassador to Israel, 1991-93; ambassador to Zai= re,=20 1987-1991.=20 Arthur A. Hartman =E2=80=94 ambassador to the Soviet Union, 1981-87; ambassa= dor to=20 France, 1977-1981.=20 Retired Marine Gen. Joseph P. Hoar =E2=80=94 commander in chief of U.S. Cent= ral=20 Command, overseeing forces in the Middle East, 1991-94; deputy chief of staf= f,=20 Marine Corps, 1990-94.=20 H. Allen Holmes =E2=80=94 assistant secretary of Defense for special operati= ons,=20 1993-99; assistant secretary of State for politico-military affairs, 1986-89= .=20 Robert V. Keeley =E2=80=94 ambassador to Greece, 1985-89; ambassador to Zimb= abwe,=20 1980-84.=20 Samuel W. Lewis =E2=80=94 director of State Department policy and planning,=20= 1993-94;=20 ambassador to Israel, 1977-1985.=20 Princeton N. Lyman =E2=80=94 assistant secretary of State for International=20 Organization Affairs, 1995-98; ambassador to South Africa, 1992-95.=20 Jack F. Matlock Jr. =E2=80=94 ambassador to the Soviet Union, 1987-1991; dir= ector for=20 European and Soviet Affairs, National Security Council, 1983-86; ambassador=20 to Czechoslovakia, 1981-83.=20 Donald F. McHenry =E2=80=94 ambassador to the United Nations, 1979-1981.=20 Retired Air Force Gen. Merrill A. McPeak =E2=80=94 chief of staff, U.S. Air=20= Force,=20 1990-94.=20 George E. Moose =E2=80=94 assistant secretary of State for African affairs,=20= 1993-97;=20 ambassador to Senegal, 1988-91.=20 David D. Newsom =E2=80=94 acting secretary of State, 1980; undersecretary of= State=20 for political affairs, 1978-1981; ambassador to Indonesia, 1973-77=20 Phyllis E. Oakley =E2=80=94 assistant secretary of State for intelligence an= d=20 research, 1997-99.=20 James Daniel Phillips =E2=80=94 ambassador to the Republic of Congo, 1990-93= ;=20 ambassador to Burundi, 1986-1990.=20 John E. Reinhardt =E2=80=94 professor of political science, University of Ve= rmont,=20 1987-91; ambassador to Nigeria, 1971-75.=20 Retired Air Force Gen. William Y. Smith =E2=80=94 deputy commander in chief,= U.S.=20 European Command, 1981-83.=20 Ronald I. Spiers =E2=80=94 undersecretary-general of the United Nations for=20= Political=20 Affairs, 1989-1992; ambassador to Pakistan, 1981-83.=20 Michael Sterner =E2=80=94 deputy assistant secretary of State for Near East=20= affairs,=20 1977-1981; ambassador to the United Arab Emirates, 1974-76.=20 Retired Adm. Stansfield Turner =E2=80=94 director of the Central Intelligenc= e Agency,=20 1977-1981.=20 Alexander F. Watson =E2=80=94 assistant secretary of State for Inter-America= n=20 affairs, 1993-96; deputy permanent representative to the U.N., 1989-1993. So= urce:=20 Diplomats and Military Commanders for Change>> http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-diplo13jun13.story ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html