[lit-ideas] Re: Conversation Without Implicature [correction.2]

  • From: Robert Paul <rpaul@xxxxxxxx>
  • To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:21:11 -0700

I must apologise to JL and maybe to Grice. I just learned that 'vice' is the (a) British spelling of 'vise.' It would be, I think, odd to say that 'vise' was the American spelling of 'vice.' Ambguity

abounds.

I hope that Grice didn't say this. He surely knew the difference between a vice and a vise (whose etymology is not what is alleged above). Only in spoken English would 'Smith was caught...,'
be ambiguous.

I think someone is pulling our millipedian appendages.

RP
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html

Other related posts:

  • » [lit-ideas] Re: Conversation Without Implicature [correction.2] - Robert Paul