"I hope your depression lifts; you don't want to become the Van Gogh of photography." I watched a PBS documentary on the Wolverine this evening. They have a tremendous range, 500 miles, and they are always moving. Maybe I'm a bit like the wolverine. I need to keep doing things and experience something akin to post-partum depression after I finish a study or writing project. Perhaps anyone would. But I also experience something a bit more complex when I encounter the sort of difficulty the E-1 seller and his camera have presented me. Should I have done something different? I go over what I did and think not. I suspect I shall have to pay for the repairs without any help from the seller or eBay, but back there some place, if I will admit it to myself that I considered that possibility and wanted to have this repaired camera despite the cost. I was not willing to let Olympus destroy the camera in an "environmentally safe manner," or try to return it to this seller who in his eBay description stated that he would not accept returns. But perhaps, also, I was attached to the emotional idea of the E-1 and this E-1 in particular. Following Collin Diamond's example, I should take off the seller's hood, let him out of the chair and send him on his way. Yes, the seller is undoubtedly guilty just as "Loverboy" was guilty of sleeping with Diamond's wife. He suffered while in the chair and perhaps the E-1 seller has suffered imagining the trouble I might cause him, but I don't really want to invest anymore time in him. The seller is sure to be more careful next time, and Loverboy may forego adultery completely in the future. But Diamond and I have to let them go. I just received a notice from Olympus that my repaired E-1 has been turned over to UPS for delivery to San Jacinto. Since the Olympus Service Center is only 50 or 60 miles away, I shall probably get it tomorrow. Let Loverboy have his memories of his adultery, and let the E-1 seller rejoice in his having outsmarted one more sucker -- or . . . someone used to say in a postscript something like "do not attribute to malice what just as easily can be attributed to stupidity." The seller may very well have purchased this E-1 and then not been willing to confess that he didn't understand it. He said it worked the last time he used this, but how long ago was that and how many photos did he take, 10, 20? He may be much closer in this business to stupidity than he is to malice -- which is an even better reason to let him go. I read a couple of more comments on Olympus forums about the E-1. The E-1 is more weather-proof than the later pro cameras, E-3 and E-5. One of the pro photographers takes photos of sailing regattas using his E-1, and at the end of the day he uses a hose to wash the salt-water off of it. Not many cameras would tolerate that treatment . . . so this camera may very well be worth twice as much as I thought I was paying for it. I feel a spring now in my words, much as there was in Collin Diamond's steps as he walked away from the warehouse where he had kept Loverboy. Lawrence From: lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Robert Paul Sent: Monday, February 07, 2011 2:07 PM To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [lit-ideas] Bruce Aune [your blog] Lawrence, I noticed that one of your blog team members is Bruce Aune. Do you know if he is the philosopher of that name who is an emeritus professor at the University of Massachusets at Amherst? (Perhaps those who sign up for the blog aren't required to give such information-?) I hope your depression lifts; you don't want to become the Van Gogh of photography. Anyway http://www.umass.edu/philosophy/faculty/faculty-pages/aune.htm Best. Robert ------------------------------------------------------------------ _____ No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 10.0.1204 / Virus Database: 1435/3428 - Release Date: 02/07/11