McEvoy quotes interestingly from Popper: "From Popper's viewpoint there is, however, a link between the philosophical obsession with 'meaning-analysis' and "still deeper roots: to animism" [RATAOS, p.264]. And perhaps this is what you are getting at." I am reminded of ... yes, sorry. Grice, when he writes about Aristotle thinking that ordinary language is a pretty good guide to metaphysics. "But to my mind much of the most significant opposition came from those who felt that 'ordinary language philosophy' was an affront to science and to intellectual progress, and who regarded its exponents as wantonly dedicating themselves to what Russell, in talking about common sense or some allied idea, once called 'stone-age metaphysics'. The quote, also in Atlas's book on indeterminacy is: "Work in [a more formal] style was directed to a number of topics, but principally to an attempt to show, in a constructive way, that grammar (the grammar of ordinary discourse) could be regarded as, in Russell's words, "a pretty good guide to logical form", or to a suitable representation of logical form." (p. 60, Reply to Richards). -- Thus, Peter can swim or Peter swim can, both translate as C(P, S). -- And "Errare humanum est" or "to herr is uman" as H(E, stc). Where 'spatio-temporal continuity'. I'm also reminded of "Critique of linguistic philosophy" (Clarendon) where the author quotes Strawson claiming that 'what's nonsensical in English must be nonsensical in _any_ language". Cheers, JL J. L. Speranza, Esq. Town: Calle Arenales 2021, Piso 5, St. 8, La Recoleta C1124AAE, Buenos Aires, Argentina. Tel. 54 11 4824 4253 Fax 54 221 425 9205 Country: St. Michael Hall, Calle 58, No. 611, La Plata B1900 BPY Provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina. Tel. 54 221 425 7817 Fax 54 221 425 9205 http://www.stmichaels.com.ar jls@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx jlsperanza@xxxxxxx http://www.netverk/~jls.htm ************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com