I can see the 2.7.0 release is out - thank you for that. I see that the 2.6.0
and 2.6.0-alpha1 releases had a .tar.gz build attached to them. Is that part of
any release script, or is that just something that’s been done by hand in
earlier times?
Thanks,
John
On 9/20/17, 3:46 PM, "liblouis-liblouisxml-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of
John Brugge" <liblouis-liblouisxml-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of
johnbrugge@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
That would be great, Christian. I appreciate it.��u� �*m���~�^������h�yhiحjwe�y,��k�7����z�(��m����&��謢�
John
On 9/20/17, 6:55 AM, "Christian Egli" <christian.egli@xxxxxx> wrote:
Hi John?��u�?�*m���~�^������h�yhiحjwe�y,��k�7����z�(��m����&�謢�
On 09/18/2017 11:11 PM, John Brugge wrote:
Sorry to be a nag, but we would love to have a tag to refer to on
liblouisutdml so we could have a repeatable clone. Since it looks like the
latest pull request brought Hammer’s fix into master, would it be possible
to put even an “2.7.0 alpha2” tag on it? That would make it feel much safer
to put into our Docker script.
I finally managed to create a couple of Docker images to test the
compatibility between the various components. Looks like current master
liblouisutdml works with liblouis 3.2.0. So I will tag that as 2.7 and
then try to integrate the patches that Attila provided for compatibility
with the latest stable liblouis.
Hope that helps
Christian
Speaking of help, John would you be willing to help with liblouisutdml
maintenance?
Thanks
--
Christian Egli
Swiss Library for the Blind, Visually Impaired and Print Disabled
Grubenstrasse 12, CH-8045 Zürich, Switzerland
-----
Die SBS unterstuetzt die Leseaktion Prix Chronos. Lesen auch Sie mit!
Erfahren Sie mehr unter http://www.prixchronos.ch.
