[liblouis-liblouisxml] Re: Undocumented opcodes
- From: "John J. Boyer" <johnjboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: liblouis-liblouisxml@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 09:59:58 -0600
Christian,
Many of these opcodes are unimplemented. The "caps" opcodes, for
example, were introduced to handle capitalization in UEBC, but
implementing them turned out to be difficult. I'll need an extra push to
put in that effort. The same goes for the "compemph" opcodes. There
hasn't been any real demand for emphasis within computer braille. the
compdots opcode should be documented, and I thought I had done so. It's
a more general name for the same thing as comp6. I guess the
unimplemented opcodes should be included in the documentation with a
note that they are unimplemented.
John
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 04:28:49PM +0100, Christian Egli wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I checked the documentation against the code and it appears that the
> following opcodes are not documented:
>
> boldword
> compbegcaps
> compbegemph1
> compbegemph2
> compbegemph3
> compcapsign
> compdots
> compendcaps
> compendemph1
> compendemph2
> compendemph3
> firstwordcaps
> italword
> lastwordaftercaps
> lenbegcaps
> lencapsphrase
> nobreak
> underword
>
> Are they internal or should we have documentation for them?
>
> Thanks
> Christian
> --
> Christian Egli
> Swiss Library for the Blind and Visually Impaired
> Grubenstrasse 12, CH-8045 Zürich, Switzerland
>
> For a description of the software and to download it go to
> http://www.jjb-software.com
--
My websites:
http://www.godtouches.org
http://www.jjb-software.com
Location: Madison, WI, USA
For a description of the software and to download it go to
http://www.jjb-software.com
Other related posts:
