Hi Bert,
Ok. Besides, I think I misunderstood the test. I thought I was reading the
expected output, and not the actual output.
Bue
-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: liblouis-liblouisxml-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:liblouis-liblouisxml-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] På vegne af Bert Frees
Sendt: 22. juli 2015 18:22
Til: liblouis-liblouisxml@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Emne: [liblouis-liblouisxml] Re: SV: [liblouis/liblouis] 8be409: Explain some
xfails in da-dk
Hi Bue, so you mean the test data is wrong?
The reason I am going through these tests is that I want to detect different
behavior between v2.6.3 and Mike Gray's ueb_update branch. I'm not so much
interested in the tests themselves right now. (Of course I am interested in
correct test data but not in this context.)
Bue Vester-Andersen writes:
Hi Bert,For a description of the software, to download it and links to
The ones that I have been through are false failures. It looks like the
contraction opcode is simply not being taken into account in the tests. Once
I have finished restructuring my tables and making g2 limited, I am going to
make a completely new set of tests anyway, so don't bother too much until
then.
Bue
-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: liblouis-liblouisxml-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:liblouis-liblouisxml-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] På vegne af Bert Frees
Sendt: 21. juli 2015 20:18
Til: liblouis-liblouisxml@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Emne: [liblouis-liblouisxml] [liblouis/liblouis] 8be409: Explain some xfails
in da-dk
Branch: refs/heads/regression_test_data
Home: https://github.com/liblouis/liblouis
Commit: 8be409da84f18b024fbd93868da3610ef2c696f6
https://github.com/liblouis/liblouis/commit/8be409da84f18b024fbd93868da3610ef2c696f6
Author: Bert Frees <bertfrees@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2015-07-21 (Tue, 21 Jul 2015)
Changed paths:
M tests/harness/da-dk-g26-dictionary_harness.txt
M tests/harness/da-dk-g28-dictionary_harness.txt
Log Message:
-----------
Explain some xfails in da-dk
