will do. Jonathan On 19-Jul-07, at 11:56 AM, David Young wrote: > At 19/07/2007, you wrote: >> Last week I posted a photo of a male California Quail at >> >> http://www=2Ewildlightphoto=2Ecom/birds/odontophoridae/caqu03=2Ehtml >> >> I now have photos of a female quail and one of their several >> (dozen=3F) >> 3/4-sized chicks: >> >> http://www=2Ewildlightphoto=2Ecom/birds/odontophoridae/caqu04=2Ehtml >> http://www=2Ewildlightphoto=2Ecom/birds/odontophoridae/caqu06=2Ehtml >> http://www=2Ewildlightphoto=2Ecom/birds/odontophoridae/caqu05=2Ehtml >> >> Technical stuff: R8/DMR, 560mm f/6=2E8 + UET-R, tripod, ISO 400, heavy >> overcast=2E >> All comments welcome=2E >> >> Doug Herr > > > Good morning, Doug! > > The first (male) shot, is still, far and away, the best of the lot. > > But the others are shots most of us would die for! Of them, I think > 06 comes closest to the male. > > Very nice effort. Thanks for sharing! > > Cheers! > > --- > > David Young, > Logan Lake, CANADA > > Wildlife Photographs: http://www.telyt.com/ > Personal Web-pages: http://www3.telus.net/~telyt > Stock Photography at: http://tinyurl.com/2amll4 > > ------ > Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: > http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm > Archives are at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/ ------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm Archives are at: //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/