[LRflex] Re: a 4/3 sensor to match the 36mm size? (corrected version)
- From: David Young <telyt@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2007 14:34:56 -0800
In my earlier post, I missed a phrase...
The paragraph should have read:
The 27mm distance is well within the image circle of current "R"
lenses (for they must cover the diagonal of the 35mm frame), thus
making it possible for Leica to keep current customers happy, while
attracting new pros to the "ideal format" in a 35mm-ish sized camera.
It's an interesting idea, Xavier. One well worth conjecture, for it
would easily explain all the seemingly conflicting statements Leica
have made about sensor size being "larger than full frame", in the coming R10!
Cheers!
---
David Young,
Logan Lake, CANADA
Wildlife Photographs: http://www.telyt.com/
Personal Web-pages: http://www3.telus.net/~telyt
Stock Photography at: http://tinyurl.com/2amll4
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
Archives are at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
---
David Young,
Logan Lake, CANADA
Wildlife Photographs: http://www.telyt.com/
Personal Web-pages: http://www3.telus.net/~telyt
Stock Photography at: http://tinyurl.com/2amll4
Other related posts:
