[LRflex] Re: Wildlife (almost)
- From: Richard Ward <ilovaussiesheps@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 14:53:24 -0400
On Jul 26, 2011, at 2:11 PM, "David Young" <dsy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Otherwise, if the glass is good and matched to the sensor, there is little
> to choose between any of them!
A 'truer words were never spoken' right back at you on that one.
I also whole heartedly agree with the points you describe where full frame has
advantages over it's smaller bretheren. They actively occurred to me as I
wrote, but once the film size analogy had occured to me I was quite concerned
about hiding the beauty I saw in it by burying it inside a comprehensive
rundown of our embarassment of riches. Therefore I stuck with as brief a
posting as I could swing without using bumper sticker arguments.
If a photographer is getting bum photos consistently from a semi-recent camera
is dealing with a 'driver' issue and not a 'car' one. :-)
My sincere sympathies on the back thing. Ouch.
Getting out to shoot is a great idea, though.
Activeness is great medicine for mind and body.
Peace
Richard------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
Archives are at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
Other related posts:
