[LRflex] Re: R4s Mod P
- From: "telyt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <telyt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 16:05:03 -0500
> the R4s with more limited features, but=20
> which had most of the erratic bits left out=2E It proved quite reliable=
=2E
>
> The R4 Mod II (Mod P in the USA) was similar but with all the=20
> features of the R4 back in=2E
The R4s Mod P didn't have the P or T exposure modes of the R4 and had a fe=
w
new features the R4 and R4s didn't have, and which were carried over to th=
e
R5 and R-E bodies; for example better weather/dust seals at the shutter
speed/mode dial cluster and a more ergonomic exposure override lever=2E M=
y
experience with the R4s and R4sP is that they are quite reliable if they'r=
e
serviced every 10 to 15 years, and a late-model R4 (mine is s/n 1,58x,xxx)=
is also reliable=2E
Doug Herr
Birdman of Sacramento
http://www=2Ewildlightphoto=2Ecom
--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web=2Ecom/ =2E
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
Archives are at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
Other related posts:
