Thanks Davidn° 2 and crop : I attribute the necessity for a crop to my eye getting used to the 4/3 ratio :-[ - Didier and George helped me find my 24x36 bearing back :-D n° 1 was shot at 27 mm i.e. 54 in 35mm - and the slant was probably due to the buildings being on a higher plane. I'm still dreaming of a tilt lens ... but a Leica 4/3 one.
Thanks for your kind help, I'll try my PSE skills and show the results. Amitiés Philippe David Young wrote:
Philippe showed:PAW 08 is now up at : http://tinyurl.com/397ecq Alternate is here : http://tinyurl.com/2ktgu6Good Mornin', Philippe!I agree with Didier and George ... the revised version of your alternate is MUCH better. That being said, I still prefer the first shot.I suspect, however, that it was taken much closer than it first appears. The buildings are exhibiting the "lean" that w/a shots have when the lens is pointed upwards. Both outside walls lean towards the center ... just a little, though it is more noticeable on the left building. This is easily corrected in Silkypix, with the "vertical" slider and it needs only a light touch.Still, it is, to my feeble mind, the better of the two. Both, however, are very good... the second, more so, after the cropping.Thanks, for sharing! --- David Young, Logan Lake, CANADA Limited Edition Prints at: www.furnfeather.net Personal Web-site at: www.main.furnfeather.net Stock Photography at: http://tinyurl.com/2amll4 ------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/ Archives are at: //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/ Archives are at: //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/