Ola Doug, I would like to second all of our's agreement with your distaste for what you learned about the immoral actions some photographers choose to engage in. What occurs to me as I write this note is that I strongly suspect there exists federal laws/regulations if not state and local ones regarding protection of Migratory Birds and maybe even non-migrating ones, as well. Further, if Doug's shooting in a state or national park, I'm almost certain such activities would be illegal and if he's in a wildlife refuge I'd be definite they would be illegal. Possibly he could photographically document their activities, persons, &/or vehicles, and contact the appropriate authorities. However, based on an extensive investigative article I read in 'Audobon'(?) on the horrifying havoc 'certain' owners of Raptors are wreaking upon migratory bird populations with their 'possessions' - successfully prosecuting even egregious violators is disturbingly difficult. I do think you attempting to document & refer to authorities is the appropriate course of action, but realistic expectations might be needed to avoid disappointment. To illustrate the challenges of the situation (somewhat) let me relate the difficulties I've faced resolving Someone Acting In Wanton Disregard for HUMAN Safety. I reside in a home in a suburban area and the woman who delivers the daily newspaper uses a Chrysler MiniVan to drive the route. She never leaves the vehicle and routinely allows her adolescent sons to stand in the wells of the open sliding doors and hang from the luggage rack as she zips along at speeds up to 40mph. Three conversations with police officers reporting it (followed by them conversing with her) and calling the paper (who called her) have been ineffectual. The weather has turned much, much colder with standing snow now, so with the severe windchill factor the boys will be safe until spring (at least I hope). The officers say photographic evidence wouldn't be determinative without an officer witnessing it etc etc. I am at loss at this point as to my next actions. I have never interacted with this person other than to witness these actions - I have no grudge or axe to grind - I don't know her from flippin' Adam! I just desperately don't want to watch someone DIE outside my picture window. Sincerely hoping you might achieve better results should you attempt something. Richard in Michigan ________________________________ [---Insert Irony Here---] ________________________________ ________________________________ From: Marc Dufour <foto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Sat, December 4, 2010 11:58:52 AM Subject: [LRflex] Re: OT rant: No wonder birders are wary of photographers! I fully second your position, Doug. Nothing but respect. Marc PS: Did you receive the message I wrote yesterday? -----Mensaje original----- De: leicareflex-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:leicareflex-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] En nombre de Doug Herr Enviado el: sábado, 04 de diciembre de 2010 14:25 Para: lug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; LEG; LeicaReflex Asunto: [LRflex] OT rant: No wonder birders are wary of photographers! Yesterday I learned first-hand how some photographers get many of their 'action' photos of wild birds that are very popular on internet photography forums. They have a friend chase the birds and startle them to make the birds fly past the photographer. If this is what it takes to make popular photos then I'm perfectly content with boring non-action photos of relaxed birds. Doug Herr Birdman of Sacramento http://www.wildlightphoto.com ------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/ Archives are at: //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/ ------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/ Archives are at: //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/ ------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/ Archives are at: //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/