Nice demo. It's funny. When I have used the features in PS or Lightroom to correct for the keystone effect of pointing a camera upward, I play and play and usually get the lines nice and straight as in your second example, but after looking at it for quite some time, I usually go back to the original, or at least to one that is less perfectly corrected, as the perfect one just looks funny. Maybe it is because after 40+ years of photography, I have just gotten use to the effect, and expect the effect when I view a photo that I know was taken in this manner. So, I will go uncorrect the image and maybe go half way to perfect lines and it looks better to my eye. Maybe my eye needs adjustments. Maybe I should have been weaned on a view camera with all the shifts and tilts so I would have grown up not expecting keystone looking photos. Do I need help? But more on topic, does PTlens do things that PS and Lightroom cannot do? Aram -------------------------------------------------- From: "philippe.amard" <philippe.amard@xxxxxx> Sent: Saturday, March 12, 2011 7:50 AM To: <leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: [LRflex] OT: PTlens > I was pointed to this piece of soft when I complained about vignetting > and distortion on a lens I own. > > A is as is, straight out of the camera > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/Playground/PT-Lens-A-0694.jpg.html > > B is overfiddled with in PTlens > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/Playground/PT-Lens-B.jpg.html > > Hope this might help some of you > Ph > > > > > ------ > Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: > http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/ > Archives are at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/ > ------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/ Archives are at: //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/