[LRflex] Re: [Leica] IMGs: Friday: Framing Flowers
- From: George Lottermoser <imagist3@xxxxxxx>
- To: Leica Users Group <lug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 13:18:51 -0500
On Sep 13, 2013, at 12:36 PM, Aram Langhans wrote:
> Hi George. #2 for sure. Too many competing things in #1. The central, the
> shadow and the petal on the right. #2 eliminates the petal on the right, and
> to my eye is much better.
>
> Aram
>
> -----Original Message----- From: George Lottermoser
> Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 7:59 AM
> To: Group Users Leica
> Cc: LRF reflex
> Subject: [LRflex] IMGs: Friday: Framing Flowers
>
> c & c always welcome and appreciated
>
> <http://www.imagist.com/blog/?p=7938>
Thanks Ted and Aram.
I certainly can see what you mean Aram.
And I think I agree.
Sometimes it's hard to give up little details we enjoy looking at.
The "original" full frame includes both [of course]
and it just wouldn't work for the reasons you cite: too many competing things;
as well as just too damn symmetrical.
So I tried both of these;
and thought they're both better than the original un-cropped frame.
Regards,
George Lottermoser
george@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
Archives are at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
Other related posts:
- » [LRflex] Re: [Leica] IMGs: Friday: Framing Flowers - George Lottermoser