[LRflex] Re: Is it worth to buy 50 /1.4 with ROM
- From: Thomas Schofield <tdschofield@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 09:37:59 -0800 (PST)
For sharpness wide open, you want the model that takes
E60 front filters, whch probably are all ROM lenses,
but not the older model that takes 55mm filters,
whether ROM or not. The filter size is the indicator
of having the new optical formula, not whether or not
ROM. ROM just zooms the flash head on flashes so
equipped. ROM only communicates through the R8/9 to
the flash, and not even through to the DMR.
(Said realizing there will be a slew of replies by
happy 1st Gen Summilux users, who prefer the bokeh,
smooth color rendition and fingerprint of their
beloved lens!)
Tom Schofield
--- tt688688@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Hi, Guys
>
> I am newbie here and want to learn from your guys.
>
> I want to buy a second hand 50 Summilux F1.4 or 50
> Summicron F2, is it worth
> to get a ROM version from optical quality point
> view? because I am use Canon
> 5D and ROM is useless to me,
>
>
> Best Regards
> tt
> email: tt688688@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> ------
> Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
> http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
> Archives are at:
> //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
Cheap talk?
Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates.
http://voice.yahoo.com
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
Archives are at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
Other related posts:
