Hi George & David, I like the whole group of images including the one with the truck, but that doesnt neccessarily mean I think that third one fits in well with the images above it. Each image is successful, but the presence of the vehicle, for me, means that image isn't speaking with the same visual repetoire as the others with their strictly organic subjects. More importantly: How cold did you get shooting out there in the snow? :-D Begining of the month I shot til three different camera batteries went dead and I couldn't feel either hand and my legs were numb from the knees down. Not bad for thirty three minutes of shooting - if my exif files are accurate. It was Glorious Fun! Richard in Michigan _____________________________________ My Sarcasm Fu Is Strong, Proceed With Caution. :-) _____________________________________ On Feb 25, 2012, at 3:58 PM, George Lottermoser <imagist3@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Feb 24, 2012, at 11:44 AM, David Young wrote: > >>> c & c always welcome and appreciated >>> >>> <http://www.imagist.com/blog/?p=6134> >> >> G'Mornin' George! >> >> I love the top shot. I simply find the composition very appealing. >> >> However, I find the car in the third shot to be a real distraction. YMMV. >> >> But, as always, very nicely done! > > thanks for taking the time to look and comment David. > > and yes - I guess my mileage does vary > as I like the visual tension between the car and the leaves ;~) > > Regards, > George Lottermoser > george@xxxxxxxxxxx > http://www.imagist.com > http://www.imagist.com/blog > http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist > > > > > > ------ > Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: > http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/ > Archives are at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/ ------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/ Archives are at: //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/