I looked at them again. I am not sure I can put anything specific on what I do not like exactly. I see nothing technically wrong. On the contrary. They are well done. I like the second one more than the first with it’s increased depth of field, but neither send me. Sorry I cannot be more specific. Just me, evidentially as others like them quite a bit. I am sure there are things I take that some just can't get into for one reason or another. Just does not grab them or give them any feeling, yet I took it because I saw something there. As I said before, your view is unique and to be admired and worth seeing. And I appreciate it from that stand point, as well as the technical quality. Perhaps I should have held my "tongue". Aram -----Original Message----- From: George Lottermoser Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2012 2:47 PM To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [LRflex] Re: IMGs: FF: Two lips On Apr 27, 2012, at 2:49 PM, Aram Langhans wrote: > Interesting view. I am not sure I like it, but it is a view I have never > seen or contemplated, so that makes it worth seeing. > From: George Lottermoser > Sent: Friday, April 27, 2012 9:30 AM > To: Group Users Leica > Cc: LRF reflex > Subject: [LRflex] IMGs: FF: Two lips > > c & c always welcome and appreciated > > <http://www.imagist.com/blog/?p=6285> interesting comment Aram. I'd be curious to know If there's something there to "not like." Regards, George Lottermoser george@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.imagist.com http://www.imagist.com/blog http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist ------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/ Archives are at: //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/ ------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/ Archives are at: //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/