[LRflex] Re: IMG: Titis Parisiens and a question - THANKS and no conclusion ...

  • From: "philippe.amard" <philippe.amard@xxxxxx>
  • To: Leica Users Group <lug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 22:43:25 +0100

Thank you all - your opinions are very valuable to me and confirm my hesitations about including more or less of the surroundings - had I presented the images in the converse order or/and without the story I presume our opinions might have been different too. But your feedback helps, a lot :-)


Thanks again

Philippe

Le 1 nov. 13 à 18:35, philippe.amard a écrit :

I was in Paris last Saturday and had to get to the drugstore near my daughter's place.

I found this friendly pair among endangered species deserved "immortality" and asked them if I could take a snap, which they spontaneously agreed to.

So my question now is which one do you think works better if either does. And why svp.

a)
http://gallery.leica-users.org/d/370977-1/Paris-Hardware+Store+2-4113.jpg

or b)
http://gallery.leica-users.org/d/370973-1/Paris-Hardware+Store+3-4114.jpg

Thank you in anticipation.

Philippe


One sees clearly only with the heart. What is essential is invisible to the eye. Antoine de Saint Exupéry in Le Petit Prince.
NO ARCHIVE





_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information

One sees clearly only with the heart. What is essential is invisible to the eye. Antoine de Saint Exupéry in Le Petit Prince.
NO ARCHIVE




Other related posts:

  • » [LRflex] Re: IMG: Titis Parisiens and a question - THANKS and no conclusion ... - philippe.amard