They weren’t unhappy. They were facing the afternoon august sun.
Sent from my iPhone
Sonny Carter
http://www.SonC.com/look
On Apr 11, 2020, at 1:00 PM, Peter Stevens (Redacted sender fritzj3 for
DMARC) <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thanks, Sonny. I gotta say that those were some unhappy looking party
attendees surrounding you - were you intentional not cutting the cakes to
aggravate them? :)
Best regards,
Peter S.
On Apr 11, 2020, at 1:52 PM, Sonny Carter <sonc.hegr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
https://sonc.com/roy_rogers.htm
The brownie Hawkeye I have is a simple no focus snapshooter, a simple twin
Lens reflex. I got it about seven years old and still have it.
Mine is cleaner than this, but like it. It used 620 film same as 120, but
fully backed with paper, film frame numbers on the paper, visible thru a
little red window, you could use flash and even do time exposures.
SonC
On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 12:35 PM Peter Stevens--
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Good morning to everyone. Does anyone here have any recollections of using
a Kodak Brownie Hawkeye camera?
Yesterday, while sorting through the last of my parents boxes of photos and
documents, I came across a paper pouch containing b&w negatives of a size I
had never seen before. The negatives were “family life” shots from when my
family, before I appeared, lived in Peru around 1954 - 1956. The film stock
was just a hair wider than 2 ¼ inches and was cut in frames of about 4
inches in length. I tracked the Kodak film stock dimensions down to either
#161 or # 616, and the web site that I was using listed the Brownie Hawkeye
as being one of the models that would have accepted these films. I then
went and found what the Hawkeye looked like, and I have memories of seeing
and handling such a camera in their attic decades ago, but that was long
before I had an interest or a basic understanding of photography.
My question for anyone regarding the use of those simple box cameras was
how an image was sighted, since there appears to be no focus mechanism on
the outside of the body. The only knobs appear to be to advance the film
stock, and then there’s a grey push-button for I guess the shutter release.
There is a curved, or domed glass-like element on the very top of the
front, immediately in front of the carry strap - its almost like a prism,
from what I can make out. On the front of the box there are two ports - one
for a lens and the other, immediately above it, for another round
prism-like piece of glass. I’m guessing that the round front glass above
the lens is a part of some type of basic viewfinder assembly that works
with the prism on top - but that is purely speculation.
I’d like to know for certain how that little camera worked as I think it
would explain a lot as to why most of the images in the negatives look
blurred/unfocused. I guess those little devices were not as
“action-tracking” friendly as David’s Oly EM2 or Howard’s Nikons…and Mom,
it appears, was trying to keep up with a dog and three little kids running
around a Pacific coast beach. :)
Any explanations would be welcomed. Thanks.
Best regards,
Peter S------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://lrflex.furnfeather.ca/
Archives are at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
Regards,
Sonny
http://sonc.com
Natchitoches, Louisiana
1714
Oldest Permanent Settlement in the Louisiana Purchase
USA
