> Hello Group, > friday afternoon I was able to take an > expedition out to one of my photographic subjects, the White > Lake Channel Lighthouse on the eastern shore of Lake > Michigan (USA). I have some quick RAW conversion 'rough > drafts' up on flickr that I want to share with my friends > here on LeicaReflex. My speedy desktop computer is out of > commission at the moment so 'real' digital darkroom work is > on hold. It was quite sunny and very chilly and my hands > froze quite badly. > My framing is a bit off in some shots and > so are some of my horizons, but nothing to horrid. Both > easily remedied in post processing. I also couldn't use a > monopod or tripod and tucked my lenses in my pockets because > I can't manage the weight of a bag or a support with my > mobility issues. Luckily no supports was OK because there > was a blazing amount of light to quite give high shutter > speeds even shooting at f8 or so most of the time. > > Please let me know if there is a blue cast in these images > - either my browser is flaking out or flickr is being > erratic and pooching the colors. > > This shot was taken with my 90mm Elmarit f2.8 R on an EOS > 20D. The ISO was 200 and the aperture was f8. This image and > it's siblings shot friday with th Elmarit may prove to be my > new benchmark 'Best Ever' taken with my 20D. There's a > subtle depth and dimension in them that didn't happen with > the other lenses I shot with. > > http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4012/4371450395_c520accfa1_b.jpg > > This next was from about the same spot, more or less with > my 50mm Summicron f2 R. at f5.6, but with a Hoya Circular > Polarizer adjusted so that the white interior of the top of > the light 'popped' in the viewfinder. Note the Seagull in > upper left, makes for a nice little accent. Also note these > images call out to be seen big -big- big and the crude > flickr down sample algorythim isn't helping much. > > http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4045/4371384363_84955c8738_b.jpg > > I was also shooting with my Canon 22-55mm Zoom because, > well it's my only wide lens option! To be fair it's a > competent lens when shot at f8, which I shot at friday, but > it seriously comes up short in the ergonomics, distortion, > resolutions, and flaring, when measured against a 'big > league' prime or 'big bucks' zoom. I have made some gorgeous > images with it, but it is definitely on the 'to be replaced' > list. Note, there was a 'birder' using a spotting scope down > at the far end of the blue railing. He was smart enough and > had enough money to be using the right gloves and not > freezing his hands off on all metal lenses and equipment! > > http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2698/4371384389_ddc330d8f8_b.jpg > > This next was a depth of field exercise using the Summicron > Fifty f2 shot at f16. I haven't decided whether I like the > results or not yet as a statement of the best I'm capable > of, but I'll see if it grows on me. Note, the sun was not > far out of frame and I was using a Hoya Polarizer and a > biggish supplemental lens shade - the built in one didn't > afford much help to the front of the polarizer. > > http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4002/4371384371_ec3524dd65_b.jpg > > > My photo stream on flickr is at "http://www.flickr.com/photos/zeissfan/"; if > anyone wants > to look. I have about a dozen from friday up there. I will > update the collection as soon as I can plunge into some real > digital darkroom work. > > Finally, I want to note that I was terrified of how > Stunningly Bright the light was, but the Summi & the > Elmarit handled things wonderfully. Unequivacably > Wonderfully. My only 'blown' highlights the whole shoot was > from the SUN being in a frame! > > And to ask - Might my polarizer on the Summicron have cost > me in 'optical brilliance' more than it gave me in benefit > from controlling the light creatively? I'd planned to shoot > with and without the polarizers on, but my gloves weren't up > to the task when on and my frigid hands said shoot shoot > shoot and get back to the car. Therefore all the summi shots > were with polarizer and all of the elmarit shots were > without. When viewed full res on my screen there is a > substantial difference in the images as I pixel peep and > there is an 'atmosphere' to the elmarits even when viewed > smaller that feels missing from the Summicron. The variables > are just the filtration & shutter speeds- but the > shutter speeds for all were at or above 1/1000th so camera > shake should be minimally impactful and not cause a > consistent difference image to image. > > Thanks for viewing and please give some feedback. > > Richard in Michigan > > <br><br>________________________________<br > /> > <br /> > Leica R Lenses.<br /> > They R worth it -<br /> > They R what I Use -<br /> > They R the Answer.<br /> > Just Not 4 every ?.<br /> > ________________________________ > > > > ------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/ Archives are at: //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/