David Shouldn't side lighting show more texture than flat lighting? Jerry David Young wrote: > Barney Kahn wrote: > > >It seems to me that there was more detail of the > >feathers on the same type bird with the film shot. I > >think the huge difference is the type of ligting on > >the bird itself. I looked at the differences of the > >two and realized that detail would be harder to achive > >of the type of ligting that happens to be the one > >photographed in the digital form. > > > > > You are right, Barney! This is a point we've all overlooked... but the > much more even lighting of Doug's shot will show more detail... whereas > the strong side lighting of the late afternoon is good for dramatic > contrast, but not so conducive to fine detail. > > Thanks for looking, and for posting! > > Cheers! > > -- > David Young, > Logan Lake, BC > CANADA. > > Personal Web-site at: http://www3.telus.net/~telyt > Leica Reflex Forum web-page: http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm > > ------ > Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: > http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm > Archives are at: > www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/ ------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm Archives are at: www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/