Those are great points, Philippe. I had never, with an action shot,
intellectually considered depth of field; but it certainly is a major
contributor. Prior to reading what you wrote I guess I was just either
instinctively attracted to an image because of it or not. Thanks for getting me
to now actively consider it in composition! Wow, I feel enlightened in the same
way when I learned to consider tannin and acid components and levels in wine!
Thanks!!
Best regards,
Peter Stevens
On Dec 1, 2018, at 5:14 AM, Philippe <photo.philippe.amard@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The first one is almost graceful and somewhat surrealistic :-)
Second one suffers from deep DoF (fence and tiles) which makes it too busy.
So my pick of the day would be #1
Amities
Philippe
Le 30 nov. 2018 à 23:52, David Young <dsy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:dsy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> a écrit :
Snow day, today. So a good day to go over some photos from earlier in the
year.
Fromt the Deadman's Creek Rodeo, last May.
Here's our cowboy, starting his departure ...
http://www.furnfeather.ca/look/Departure_1.html ;
<http://www.furnfeather.ca/look/Departure_1.html>
and less than a second down the line.
http://www.furnfeather.ca/look/Departure_2.html
I can't decide which shot I prefer.
Anyone?
David.
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://lrflex.furnfeather.ca/
Archives are at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
