On Mar 8, 2009, at 4:25 AM, Doug Herr wrote (after kindly fixing up my lame auto-fill header):
From: Doug Herr <wildlightphoto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>Subject: [LRflex] Bob's Redpoll photo (was: Re: Re: leicareflex Digest V6Bob, I wonder if your Michigan Redpoll is a Hoary? I don't know either species very well but if this is different from the more southern bird I'd have to start thinking about Hoary :-)
Well... this Hoary business is something best left to you real birders; me, I just try to snap 'em.
In fact, when I shot the Indiana birds (which are probably female in contrast to the Male Michiganders) there was one subject that Ruthie really thought was a contender for this Hoary appellation:
http://www.pbase.com/bobsworld/image/109113003
And David Young wrote:
I had another case in the Indiana shoot where I was going for this two-bird-bodies-in-the-frame-for-compositional-balance thing that I'm fond of where I just hadta say bird-bod-bisecting-branch be damned, it's close enough for my standards:Good Mornin' Bob! I find that branches "in the way", are often the death knell for a shot. But this one, with it's one, big branch, does not seemed to be harmed, in the least.
http://www.pbase.com/bobsworld/image/109113004And while we're on the subject of the Sliding Scale of Standards here's a pair of snaps shot in the seconds preceding the original post where I think I kindof missed the focus a bit (in addition to pretty problematic branch clutter) but the coloring on the chest is nice to look at:
http://www.pbase.com/bobsworld/image/109930055
http://www.pbase.com/bobsworld/image/109930056The second one comes closest to showing the iridescent forehead spot that some of these birds had; it reminded me of the ones we see on Anna's Hummingbirds.
Anyway, thanks for real for looking at the first one, and for your very kind words.
Bob Palmieri