Re: Nepenthe...
- From: Ken Iisaka <ken@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: leica@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 10:51:54 -0700
Looks like there is a lot of sharpening, and some artifacts around
boundaries.
The fog is detail-less, as it can often be, but the boundary between the
fog and the ocean is abrupt. Is there any detail there in the highlights?
I like the header beam. I wonder how it would be the image is rotated so
that the beam is exactly horizontal. Or not...
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Gary Dalton <grdalton@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Here's a shot at Nepenthe, near Big Sur...
>
> I've worked through a half-dozen different versions of it and finally
> settled on a center crop (16:9)... (Trust me: It's the best one...)
>
> Questions... (Trying to learn...)
>
> Do you find the header beam and horizon lines in conflict to the point of
> distraction?
>
> Does it appear to you that the horizon is curved? (It does to me, but I'm
> thinking it has more to do with a fog bank than the lens or the angle of
> the shot.... Or that I have enough of the horizon to see the Earth's
> curvature... Ha!)
>
> Your notions about any of this... despite the ordinary nature of the
> shot...
>
>
> http://filmuser3.smugmug.com/Other/Oddities/i-GsC63WN/0/L/NepentheMobile4-2011-1722-L.jpg
>
> Thanks...
>
>
>
--
Ken Iisaka
first name at last name dot org or com
Other related posts:
- » Nepenthe...- Gary Dalton
- » Re: Nepenthe... - Ken Iisaka
